2019 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshop (ASEW) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/asew.2019.00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Static Analysis - A Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been work in recent years to address usability issues and improve the understandability of static analysis results [26,28]. These mostly focus on explaining analysis warnings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been work in recent years to address usability issues and improve the understandability of static analysis results [26,28]. These mostly focus on explaining analysis warnings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of static analysis research, further framing can be done with a distinction to technical and social research topics. In general, the former deal with tools for specific programming languages, while the latter studies the question of how these tools are used with particular languages [4], [38], [79]. The social topics include also the further question of how developers use static analysis tools to diagnose and fix weaknesses and vulnerabilities [44], [60].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static analysis tools are highly prone to false negatives (bugs not caught) and false positives (issues that are not bugs) [9], [13]. Including detection confidence indicators is one way for addressing the problem [38]. Analogously, according to recent surveys, issue severity is the most important factor for software developers in their prioritization tasks [79].…”
Section: B Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%