Explaining students' appraisal of lectures and student-activating teaching: perceived context and student characteristics

Abstract

During lectures, some students are continuously focused and attentive, whereas others tend to be bored, jittery, or inattentive. The same might happen when students are given student-activating assignments. Some students simply love one type of instruction, whereas others tend to resent it. Moreover, it is not the context itself, but the context as it is perceived by the student that affects learning. This study sets out to discover how students view instruction, based on their experiences with a particular setting, and aims to investigate the effects of ''context-by-student'' characteristics, such as students' course experiences, and the effects of ''student-by-context'' features, such as approaches to learning. The research has a quasi-experimental design and compares a lecture-based setting with student-activating teaching methods (i.e. self-discovery learning by means of authentic tasks with the help of a scaffolding approach); followed by one of four assessment methods: a multiple-choice test, a case-based examination, a peer assessment or a portfolio assessment. Data (N ¼ 579) were collected by means of validated questionnaires, comprising the ASSIST and LSQ instruments and the course experience questionnaire. Results demonstrate that students' appraisal of the assessment method, their course experiences and the teaching methods that are dominant in the setting contribute positively to students' appraisal of instruction. Interestingly, this conclusion applies to both the lecture-based and the student-activating groups and to both conventional assessment methods and new modes of assessment. Moreover, deep approaches to learning, monitoring studying and/or organized studying, as well as preferences for courses that support understanding, positively affect students' appraisal of student-activating teaching methods. In short, both student-by-context and context-by-student features prove to be strong predictors of students' appraisal of instruction and, as a consequence, student learning.

Understanding social learning relations of international students in a large classroom using social network analysis

“…Last but not least, in contrast to our previous research in medium-sized classrooms, one of the explanations (in addition to the complexities to arrange sub-group meetings in a large lecture room) why team divisions in this setting were not the primary predictor for learning at the end of the module may have been the lack of constructive alignment (Biggs & Tang, 2007;Struyven et al, 2011). The aims of team work (i.e.…”

“…However, in the last 20 years, the use of team-learning in higher education to engage students in active learning has increased (Decuyper, Dochy, & Van den Bossche, 2010), even when teaching in large classrooms (Struyven, Dochy, & Janssens, 2011).…”

The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers' beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology

“…It is believed that academics who have a more student-centred approach to teaching are more likely to achieve conceptual change amongst students, while academics who have a more teacher-centred approach to teaching are more likely to aim at the transmission of information and knowledge to students (Norton, Richardson, Hartley, Newstead, & Mayes, 2005;Postareff, et al, 2007;Prosser & Trigwell, 1999;Struyven, Dochy, & Janssens, 2011). Previous research in higher education has found that teachers adopting a more student-focussed approach to teaching are more likely to stimulate students to adopt a deep rather than a surface approach to their learning (Gow & Kember, 1993;Prosser & Trigwell, 1999).…”

Computer-supported games and role plays in teaching water management

“…Measuring the effectiveness of different didactic methods is not an easy task. Research on this topic suggests that the effectiveness of active learning methods compared to traditional lectures depends on a range of factors, including contextual factors and student characteristics (Struyven et al, 2011). In other words, the effectiveness of active learning tools like games and role plays cannot be measured as a function of the properties of the tools alone.…”