2002
DOI: 10.1080/00438240220134278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining subsistence change in southern New Zealand using foraging theory models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
42
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Land birds, seabirds, nesting turtles, reptiles, bats, and other native vertebrates were easy targets, exploited to the extent that they now serve as critical markers of colonizing sites (e.g., Anderson 1994, Steadman 2006. In the main, reliance on these fauna was unsustainable, and intensive harvesting rapidly led to numerous extinctions (e.g., Steadman et al 1994, Anderson 1997, Nagaoka 2002a, Steadman 2006. Other prey were ''depressed'' (sensu Charnov et al 1976), slowly reduced to economically unproductive and demographically unstable levels (e.g., Butler 2001, Allen 2002, McAlister 2002, Nagaoka 2002b, Morrison and Hunt 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land birds, seabirds, nesting turtles, reptiles, bats, and other native vertebrates were easy targets, exploited to the extent that they now serve as critical markers of colonizing sites (e.g., Anderson 1994, Steadman 2006. In the main, reliance on these fauna was unsustainable, and intensive harvesting rapidly led to numerous extinctions (e.g., Steadman et al 1994, Anderson 1997, Nagaoka 2002a, Steadman 2006. Other prey were ''depressed'' (sensu Charnov et al 1976), slowly reduced to economically unproductive and demographically unstable levels (e.g., Butler 2001, Allen 2002, McAlister 2002, Nagaoka 2002b, Morrison and Hunt 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zooarchaeologists have applied models derived from optimal foraging theory to the vertebrate and invertebrate faunal assemblages recovered from archaeological sites (Broughton 2002;Jones 2004;Madsen 1993;Madsen and Schmitt 1998;Nagaoka 2002;Speth 1991;Stiner 2002;Stiner et al 2000). Beyond the focus on the faunal assemblages of archaeological sites and the use of optimal foraging theory, there is little common ground in these articles.…”
Section: Applications Of Optimal Foraging Theory In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some are concerned with the evolution of modern humans and the broad-spectrum revolution (Stiner 2002;Stiner et al 2000), while others focus on issues of protein selection (Speth 1991). Some studies utilize data to evaluate hypotheses (Nagaoka 2002), while others utilize data to refine and test the models (Broughton 2002;Jones 2004).…”
Section: Applications Of Optimal Foraging Theory In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example at Lake Te Anau, Kereru, Kaka, and Kakariki were targeted (Anderson & McGovernWilson 1991). Similarly, at Shag River Mouth, despite more than 49 identified taxa, the initial focus was on blue penguins and shags, a pattern that gave way to an emphasis on New Zealand Quail in the later part of the sequence (McGovern-Wilson et al 1996;Nagaoka 2002). Even systematic harvesting of seabirds such as Puffinus griseus, once thought to be of recent origin, is now known to have a considerable antiquity in the Foveaux Strait region (Anderson 1996(Anderson , 2001.…”
Section: Implications For Maori Prehistorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species used and the relative importance of birds have, however, varied considerably over time (Anderson 1983;Nagaoka 2002;Smith 2004). During the early occupation period (ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%