2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1493564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the Influence of Anger and Compassion on Negotiators’ Interaction Goals: An Assessment of Trust and Distrust as Two Distinct Mediators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial agreements, repetitions, and rephrasing of the other's propositions have been shown to promote negotiation, in line with negotiation research findings (Liu and Wang 2010;Volkema, Fleck, and Hofmeister 2011). Here, they seem also to serve as a precondition for dialog.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Initial agreements, repetitions, and rephrasing of the other's propositions have been shown to promote negotiation, in line with negotiation research findings (Liu and Wang 2010;Volkema, Fleck, and Hofmeister 2011). Here, they seem also to serve as a precondition for dialog.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Limitation of threat came about through Jewish discussants limiting Palestinian responsibility and Arab participants' limitation of Palestinian return. Along with explicit expressions of empathy, such gestures reflecting sensitivity to the other that may have decreased threat and improved negotiation as predicted by negotiation research (Liu and Wang 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trust seems to further tendencies such as providing/exchanging information (De Dreu et al, 1998) and adopting cooperative goals (Liu & Wang, 2010), which are conducive to attaining mutuallybeneficial agreements (e.g., Beersma & De Dreu, 2005;De Dreu & Van Kleef, 2004;Thompson, 1991). Additionally, information search (Sinaceur, 2010;Thompson, 1991) and creative thinking (e.g., Kurtzberg, 1998;Ogilvie & Simms, 2009;see also De Dreu, Giacomantonio, Shalvi, & Sligte, 2009;Maddux & Galinsky, 2009) have been shown to be beneficial to reaching high joint outcomes.…”
Section: Implications For Distrust Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to intuition and earlier research, suspicious spirits seem quite well-equipped to contribute to good outcomes in negotiation on the cognitive level. On the social level, however, distrust will keep people from sharing information (e.g., Amabile & Gryskiewicz, 1989;Ekvall, 1996; see also, Liu & Wang, 2010). Suspicion is therefore likely to be beneficial to negotiation only under specific circumstances.…”
Section: Implications For Distrust Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%