2011
DOI: 10.3765/bls.v11i0.1892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the Phoneme: Why (Some Of) Phonology Is Natural

Abstract: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1985), pp. 25-38

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role played by phonological knowledge in perception is not easy to model in traditional rule-based generative theories, which restrict their formalisation to the production process, that is, the mapping from underlying to surface form. In such models, one could think about perception as a process of rule inversion (Leben & Robinson 1977), which, though, has been shown to come with several problems (Churma 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role played by phonological knowledge in perception is not easy to model in traditional rule-based generative theories, which restrict their formalisation to the production process, that is, the mapping from underlying to surface form. In such models, one could think about perception as a process of rule inversion (Leben & Robinson 1977), which, though, has been shown to come with several problems (Churma 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%