2018
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1550744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the role of international scholars in semi-peripheries. Evidence from Slovakia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When it comes to winning European grants, especially by experienced scientists, Hungary and the Czech Republic perform better, while Poland is placed at the bottom of the ranking. These results correspond to some extent with those obtained by Luczaj and Bahna (2020), where, according to the data retrieved by them from Eurostat, the share of international researchers in the Czech Republic is 5.48% and in Slovakia is 3.03%, rendering these countries more internationalized than the remaining Visegrád Group countries (Hungary 2.17%, Poland 1.64%). The low ranking of Poland in terms of ERC grants is also reflected in a relatively low impact of Polish researchers in the global context.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…When it comes to winning European grants, especially by experienced scientists, Hungary and the Czech Republic perform better, while Poland is placed at the bottom of the ranking. These results correspond to some extent with those obtained by Luczaj and Bahna (2020), where, according to the data retrieved by them from Eurostat, the share of international researchers in the Czech Republic is 5.48% and in Slovakia is 3.03%, rendering these countries more internationalized than the remaining Visegrád Group countries (Hungary 2.17%, Poland 1.64%). The low ranking of Poland in terms of ERC grants is also reflected in a relatively low impact of Polish researchers in the global context.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These findings corroborate the main conclusion from the study of foreign-born academics at Slovak and Polish universities. These studies showed the negative relationship between indicators of institutional prestige (PhD-granting rights, location in a big city, position in the local ranking) and the inflow of foreign-born employees (Luczaj and Bahna, 2020;Luczaj and Bahna, 2021). This motivation, however, seems contradictory to all the above-mentioned narratives, which emphasised that what counts for the administrators is the quality of teaching or research.…”
Section: The Second Reason -"Western" Work Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the precarity created by neoliberal policies and the increased competition within the academy in these countries caused many academics to gravitate towards new fields for work (Burford et al, 2019). In their new search, the first countries that academics tend to move to are the ones that are within the circle of developed countries (Knight, 2006;Luczaj and Bahna, 2018). Academics' tendency to also gather in specific locations (Arslan, 2017) within these countries again brings about the need to focus on their location choice based on different levels (macro, meso, micro).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, with the spread of academic mobility in the countries nearby, studies related to academic mobility have also appeared in these countries. These studies include some findings which show that the employment of foreign academics, the advantages of which are constantly being expressed, does not actually provide advantages as much as expected (Luczaj and Bahna, 2018). Therefore, it is necessary to examine these mobilities in order to understand why they have not had the same effect in the new destinations they have spread whereas they were taken into prominence due to their benefits in central countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%