2014
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g1088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining trends in Scottish coronary heart disease mortality between 2000 and 2010 using IMPACTSEC model: retrospective analysis using routine data

Abstract: Objective To quantify the contributions of prevention and treatment to the trends in mortality due to coronary heart disease in Scotland.Design Retrospective analysis using IMPACT SEC , a previously validated policy model, to apportion the recent decline in coronary heart disease mortality to changes in major cardiovascular risk factors and to increases in more than 40 treatments in nine non-overlapping groups of patients. Setting Scotland.Participants All adults aged 25 years or over, stratified by sex, age g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4,11] This model integrates nationwide data at two time points to explain an observed change in mortality. The IMPACT model was developed to (1) model CHD mortality trends and incorporates time trends in uptake of evidence-based acute phase and secondary prevention treatments, in addition to time trends in major CHD risk factors and (2) estimate the relative change in CHD mortality associated with each of these items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4,11] This model integrates nationwide data at two time points to explain an observed change in mortality. The IMPACT model was developed to (1) model CHD mortality trends and incorporates time trends in uptake of evidence-based acute phase and secondary prevention treatments, in addition to time trends in major CHD risk factors and (2) estimate the relative change in CHD mortality associated with each of these items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,11] CHD burden tends to differ by socioeconomic circumstances (SEC), with incidence and mortality generally being lower in more affluent groups. Socioeconomic inequalities also exist in the Netherlands, although of smaller magnitude compared to the UK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These improvements are a consequence of many factors including public health improvement, better acute and long term care combined with better engagement of primary care in prevention and management of CVD. The IMPACT model evaluated the reasons for the declining coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in England between 2000 and 2007 and similar analyses have been undertaken for Scotland and Northern Ireland 5 6. For England the model explained about 86% of the mortality fall, with 34% of this due to decreases in the major cardiovascular risk factors in the population, with reductions in smoking and cholesterol, and improved physical activity levels.…”
Section: Section 1: Cardiovascular Disease Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8] These studies based their estimates on ecological data or mathematical modeling of aggregate data. Few studies used individual person data, 9,10 and the studies were limited to population subgroups and did not study out-of-hospital CHD or subtypes of MI.…”
Section: Editorial See P 8 Clinical Perspective On P 81mentioning
confidence: 99%