2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-5371(02)00133-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining unemployment: some lessons from Nordic wage formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
43
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding the different approaches, our results are in accordance with Holden and Nymoen (2002) and Nymoen and Rφdseth (2003) who show that institutional or wage-pressure factors explain only a small fraction of the variation of unemployment in the Nordic countries. Our results are also in line with Henry, Karanassou and Snower (2000) who find that the NRU in the UK was reasonably stable around 4% over the 18 Actual unemployment rate…”
Section: The (Ir)relevance Of the Nrusupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Notwithstanding the different approaches, our results are in accordance with Holden and Nymoen (2002) and Nymoen and Rφdseth (2003) who show that institutional or wage-pressure factors explain only a small fraction of the variation of unemployment in the Nordic countries. Our results are also in line with Henry, Karanassou and Snower (2000) who find that the NRU in the UK was reasonably stable around 4% over the 18 Actual unemployment rate…”
Section: The (Ir)relevance Of the Nrusupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The producer price q and productivity pr are central variables in the model of wage formation. This is well established theoretically, see e.g., Nymoen and Rødseth (2003) and Forslund et al (2008), and these variables are also found to be main empirical determinants of the secular growth in wages in bargaining based systems. Based on theory and the empirical evidence, we expect the elasticity ι to be close to one.…”
Section: Optimal Price and Wage Levelssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…A reasonable assumption is that the elasticity ι with respect to productivity is close to unity, as in Nymoen and Rødseth (2003) [79]. The standard assumption about the sign of the coefficient for unemployment, , is that it is non-negative, hence − < 0, as already indicated.…”
Section: Wage-price Spiralmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We next define two theoretical (latent) real wage variables: The targeted producer real wage from the point of view of the firms, rw f with ι > 0, 0 ≤ ω ≤ 1, ≥ 0, see Nymoen and Rødseth (2003) [79].…”
Section: Wage-price Spiralmentioning
confidence: 99%