2017
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining unexplainable food choices

Abstract: In recent years, psychologists have started to investigate the downstream consequences of nonconsciously activated behaviour (acting in an 'explanatory vacuum'). Results have shown that when such behaviour is norm-violating, people experience a need to confabulate reasons for this behaviour. The present paper aims to add more convincing evidence for this assumption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, people can observe their own habits, reflect on their meaning, and infer that they serve a purpose. Such attributions may be misguided (Adriaanse et al 2018;, Wood & Rünger 2016 and amount to confabulations. However, it is not inconceivable that such reflections may form or strengthen a genuine intrinsic motivation.…”
Section: The Longevity Of Habitual Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, people can observe their own habits, reflect on their meaning, and infer that they serve a purpose. Such attributions may be misguided (Adriaanse et al 2018;, Wood & Rünger 2016 and amount to confabulations. However, it is not inconceivable that such reflections may form or strengthen a genuine intrinsic motivation.…”
Section: The Longevity Of Habitual Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that people often use post hoc justification for their habits. For example, we tend to make up reasons for unexplained automatic behaviour that align with our current values and goals (Adriaanse et al 2018 ) and Neal et al ( 2012 ) showed in an experiment that strong habits often were perceived as purposeful goal-directed behaviour, but were actually driven by recurring contextual triggers. Similar post hoc justifications for behaviour are also highlighted in cognitive dissonance theory which shows our tendency to justify actions when they are contradictory to our beliefs to reduce feelings of discomfort (Festinger 1962 ).…”
Section: Our Reliance On Habitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although monitoring one's own behaviour in order to avoid unsustainable habits and make sustainable choices is not impossible, this requires mental resources, which can easily be exhausted [26]. Also, people may misattribute control over habitual behaviour to their own willpower, whereas in reality this behaviour is controlled by the performance context [27].…”
Section: Breaking Unsustainable Habitsmentioning
confidence: 99%