2016
DOI: 10.1002/evan.21495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explanations for adaptations, just‐so stories, and limitations on evidence in evolutionary biology

Abstract: Explanations of the historical origin of specific individual traits are a key part of the research program in paleontology and evolutionary biology. Why did bipedalism evolve in the human lineage? Why did some dinosaurs and related species have head crests? Why did viviparity evolve in some reptiles? Why did the common ancestor of primates evolve stereoscopic vision, grasping hands and feet, nails instead of claws, and large brains? These are difficult questions. To varying degrees, an explanation must grapple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many explorative comparative anatomy analyses, including the present study, can be thought of as adaptationist (Gould & Lewontin, ), presenting functionally adaptive explanations for the observed data that are not easily falsified (Smith, ). Here, however, we submit that as the clearest differences in subchondral RBV/TV and DA patterns in the metacarpal heads are between the two species with the most disparate locomotor modes (orangutans and gorillas), and the least differences are between the two species with the most similar locomotor modes (chimpanzees and bonobos), this offers a kind of informal falsification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Many explorative comparative anatomy analyses, including the present study, can be thought of as adaptationist (Gould & Lewontin, ), presenting functionally adaptive explanations for the observed data that are not easily falsified (Smith, ). Here, however, we submit that as the clearest differences in subchondral RBV/TV and DA patterns in the metacarpal heads are between the two species with the most disparate locomotor modes (orangutans and gorillas), and the least differences are between the two species with the most similar locomotor modes (chimpanzees and bonobos), this offers a kind of informal falsification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Investigations of sex differences in the human skeleton have faced many of the challenges in evolutionary biology that Smith described: “Some narrative explanations rely on theory‐driven assumptions that may not be shared by readers… Some will not use good judgement when taking into account how underdetermination inevitably limits what can be inferred from historical data… Some will make unreasonable assumptions about what the current utility of a feature can tell us about its historical role… Some will make unreasonable assumptions that simplify the contingency of the historical situation… Some will allow coherence and simplicity in narratives to substitute for evidence.” 93 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of circles corresponds to the strength of the correlation identify such adaptive roots with much certainty. 85 The prevailing hypothesis on the evolutionary benefits of loneliness is based on humans having adapted to live in groups; for social creatures, loneliness may have increased the chances for survival and reproduction through the motivation to improve one's social circumstances. 1 A related evolutionary mechanism that has been widely proposed for depression is the social risk hypothesis, in which depression causes one to minimize the risk of social exclusion due to an imbalance of one's social value and social burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%