2011
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2011.555922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicating Students' Personal Professional Theories in Vocational Education through Multi-method Triangulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of the three methods discussed has been shown to be valid -via measures of interrater reliability -with researchers triangulating the results, and the three together give a good picture of a PPT (Buitink, 1998;Schaap et al, 2011). However, they all have certain individual and shared drawbacks.…”
Section: Methods To Reveal Ppts and Assess Their Qualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Each of the three methods discussed has been shown to be valid -via measures of interrater reliability -with researchers triangulating the results, and the three together give a good picture of a PPT (Buitink, 1998;Schaap et al, 2011). However, they all have certain individual and shared drawbacks.…”
Section: Methods To Reveal Ppts and Assess Their Qualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schaap et al (2011) developed a method to overcome this difficulty. Referring to Eraut (1994Eraut ( , 2000 they distinguished six domains of knowledge: (1) knowledge of the vocational field, such as general issues and trends in the profession; (2) organisational knowledge, including general work processes, information systems, management and cultural aspects (Rauner, 2007); (3) professional knowledge of the organisation one is working in; (4) target group knowledge, e.g.…”
Section: The Content and Quality Of A Pptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A possibility is to use the four qualities Schaap, de Bruijn, van der Schaaf, Baartman and Kirschner (2011) distinguished to characterise a PPT, on CPTs as well.…”
Section: However It Is Not Always Clear What the Construct Cpt Reprementioning
confidence: 99%