2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-010-9059-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit and implicit confidence judgments and developmental differences in metamemory: an eye-tracking approach

Abstract: In the present study, primary school children's ability to give accurate confidence judgments (CJ) was addressed, with a special focus on uncertainty monitoring. In order to investigate the effects of memory retrieval processes on monitoring judgments, item difficulty in a vocabulary learning task (Japanese symbols) was manipulated. Moreover, as a first exploratory step to uncover fast and retrieval bound (implicit) monitoring processes that take place before explicit CJ are openly reported, fixation time allo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the evidence on implicit metacognitive abilities in behavioral tasks (e.g., Balcomb and Gerken, 2008) we hypothesized differences in CJs between the items in the implicit measure, that is, children's fixation patterns. More concretely speaking, following the findings of Roderer and Roebers (2010), we expected participants to allocate more looking time to the parts of the CJ scale expressing high confidence for correctly compared to incorrectly answered items. Finally, we analyzed changes in pupil size by comparing children's pupil size for the animal in the learning trials and the presentation of the same animal in the test trials.…”
Section: Examining Implicit Metacognition In 35-year-old Children: Amentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, given the evidence on implicit metacognitive abilities in behavioral tasks (e.g., Balcomb and Gerken, 2008) we hypothesized differences in CJs between the items in the implicit measure, that is, children's fixation patterns. More concretely speaking, following the findings of Roderer and Roebers (2010), we expected participants to allocate more looking time to the parts of the CJ scale expressing high confidence for correctly compared to incorrectly answered items. Finally, we analyzed changes in pupil size by comparing children's pupil size for the animal in the learning trials and the presentation of the same animal in the test trials.…”
Section: Examining Implicit Metacognition In 35-year-old Children: Amentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Eye-tracking has become a frequently used, nonverbal measure of young children's performances (e.g., Paulus et al, 2011; De Bordes et al, 2012; Elsner et al, 2012a,b; Fawcett and Liszkowski, 2012). In particular, it has been shown to be a suitable method to investigate young children's learning performances (e.g., Johnson et al, 2003; McMurray and Aslin, 2004; Roebers et al, 2010; Paulus and Fikkert, 2012) and, in school-aged children, also metamemory skills (Roderer and Roebers, 2010). Roderer and Roebers (2010) examined 7–9-year-old children's explicit confidence judgments (CJs) in a memory task.…”
Section: Examining Implicit Metacognition In 35-year-old Children: Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study in a sample of adolescents and adults (aged between 11 and 41 years) indicated that confident judgments ability improves across the period of adolescence, is highest in late adolescence and stabilizes in adulthood [14]. It has been also reported that confidence judgments improve during late childhood, age 7-12 years [65]. Several studies have reported that adults are better than adolescents in the control of action [14], in self-evaluation, [6] and top-down control [66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 5-point Likert-type smiley scale on A4 laminated paper in landscape format was used as a measure for the JoL and ranged from a frowning smiley to a smiling smiley. This scale has been successfully used in previous research on metacognition in school children as young as 6 or 7 years (Destan et al, 2014;Lockl & Schneider, 2003;Paulus, Tsalas, Proust, & Sodian, 2014;Roderer & Roebers, 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%