2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit and implicit effects of anti-marijuana and anti-tobacco TV advertisements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with some prior research suggesting that automatic evaluations as measured by the IAT can sometimes change in response to advertisements (Czyzewska & Ginsburg, 2007;Maio et al, 2009;Park, Felix, & Lee, 2007) and other treatments involving verbal information (e.g., Petty et al, 2006;Teachman & Woody, 2003; see Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, for a review). Although this research demonstrates that automatic evaluations can be influenced by traditional persuasive messages, it is unclear what the psychological processes were underlying the obtained effects, and whether those changes were consequential.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These findings are consistent with some prior research suggesting that automatic evaluations as measured by the IAT can sometimes change in response to advertisements (Czyzewska & Ginsburg, 2007;Maio et al, 2009;Park, Felix, & Lee, 2007) and other treatments involving verbal information (e.g., Petty et al, 2006;Teachman & Woody, 2003; see Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, for a review). Although this research demonstrates that automatic evaluations can be influenced by traditional persuasive messages, it is unclear what the psychological processes were underlying the obtained effects, and whether those changes were consequential.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Sample sizes ranged from 28 to 3608 (median: 284, IQR: 47–80). Three RCTs exposed individuals to marijuana-specific anti-illicit-drug PSAs,18 20 23 and four RCTs exposed individuals to a variety of anti-illicit-drug PSAs 16 19 21 22. Two RCTs reported positive effects of anti-illicit-drug PSAs corresponding to a −0.01 reduction in intention to use illicit drugs on a 1–7 scale of intention, and to a 0.06 increase in intention to call a drug-abuse hotline on a 1–5 scale of intention 16 18.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrated no significant benefit, and no studies reported any long-term effectiveness of these interventions. Importantly, most RCT and observational studies reported non-significant results, and three RCTs and one observational study found that anti-illicit-drug PSAs may have negative effects on anti-illicit-drug-use norms among targeted populations 4 19 20 22…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If they are faster on average to respond to the first trial than the second, it is assumed that the individual must prefer chocolate ice cream to brussel sprouts. This method is sensitive to subtle differences between the two target categories, and it has been used extensively in research on health-related behaviours [20,27] and discrimination [18].…”
Section: The Implicit Association Testmentioning
confidence: 99%