2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-018-1612-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit and implicit methods for shear band modeling at high strain rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, one needs to compute the Jacobian of the nonlinear system in (1), which can be done numerically using a finite difference approach [33,34,35,36] or analytically, thus reducing some of the numerical burden [30]. The matrix associated with the INC scheme is much larger than that used in splitting methods (combined with explicit schemes) but typically requires fewer time steps since the stability requirements are less restrictive [37]. Nonetheless, the bottleneck of such monolithic schemes is the efficiency of the linear solver which may not be suited for these thermo-mechanical systems.…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, one needs to compute the Jacobian of the nonlinear system in (1), which can be done numerically using a finite difference approach [33,34,35,36] or analytically, thus reducing some of the numerical burden [30]. The matrix associated with the INC scheme is much larger than that used in splitting methods (combined with explicit schemes) but typically requires fewer time steps since the stability requirements are less restrictive [37]. Nonetheless, the bottleneck of such monolithic schemes is the efficiency of the linear solver which may not be suited for these thermo-mechanical systems.…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%