2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit Aqueous Solvation Treatment of Epinephrine from Car–Parrinello Molecular Dynamics: Effect of Hydrogen Bonding on the Electronic Absorption Spectrum

Abstract: The electronic absorption spectrum of the neurotransmitter epinephrine (EPN) in water solution is studied, combining ab initio Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics (CPMD) with a quantum mechanical approach within the framework of the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) scheme. By selecting 52 uncorrelated snapshots, the excitation modes were calculated at the LC-ωPBE/6-31+G(d) level of theory, using an optimal range-separation parameter ω, determined by means of the gap-tuning scheme in the presence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We specifically chose the ωB97X-D/cc-pVTZ functional for our studies since it contains an asymptotically correct (range-separated) portion of nonlocal exchange in conjunction with dispersion corrections, which are essential for accurately predicting charge-transfer excitations and hydrogen-bonding interactions. It is also important to note that prior work by Neto et al has shown that the optimal range-separated parameter, ω, required to accurately predict excited states in the explicit solvent is 0.25, which is already close to the default value of ω = 0.2 used in the ωB97X-D/cc-pVTZ functional. We showed in our previous work that (1) changing the range separation value, (2) using different exchange-correlation functionals, (3) utilizing a larger basis set (such as aug-cc-pVTZ), and (4) altering the positions of explicit water molecules did not change the spectra significantly within the relevant wavelength range (see Supporting Information).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…We specifically chose the ωB97X-D/cc-pVTZ functional for our studies since it contains an asymptotically correct (range-separated) portion of nonlocal exchange in conjunction with dispersion corrections, which are essential for accurately predicting charge-transfer excitations and hydrogen-bonding interactions. It is also important to note that prior work by Neto et al has shown that the optimal range-separated parameter, ω, required to accurately predict excited states in the explicit solvent is 0.25, which is already close to the default value of ω = 0.2 used in the ωB97X-D/cc-pVTZ functional. We showed in our previous work that (1) changing the range separation value, (2) using different exchange-correlation functionals, (3) utilizing a larger basis set (such as aug-cc-pVTZ), and (4) altering the positions of explicit water molecules did not change the spectra significantly within the relevant wavelength range (see Supporting Information).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…17 We specifically chose the ωB97X-D functional for our studies since it contains an asymptoticallycorrect (range-separated) portion of nonlocal exchange in conjunction with dispersion corrections, which are essential for accurately predicting charge-transfer excitations and hydrogenbonding interactions, 18 respectively. It is also important to note that prior work by Neto et al 19 has shown that the optimal range-separated parameter, ω, required to accurately predict excited-states in explicit solvent is 0.25, which is already close to the default value of ω = 0.2 used in the ωB97X-D functional. To test the effects of (1) changing the range-separation value,…”
supporting
confidence: 54%
“…17 We specifically chose the ωB97X-D functional for our studies since it contains an asymptoticallycorrect (range-separated) portion of nonlocal exchange in conjunction with dispersion corrections, which are essential for accurately predicting charge-transfer excitations and hydrogenbonding interactions, 18 respectively. It is also important to note that prior work by Neto et al 19 has shown that the optimal range-separated parameter, ω, required to accurately predict excited-states in explicit solvent is 0.25, which is already close to the default value of ω = 0.2 used in the ωB97X-D functional. To test the effects of (1) changing the range-separation value, (2) using different exchange-correlation functionals, (3) utilizing a larger basis set (such as aug-cc-pVTZ), and (4) altering the positions of explicit water molecules, we spot-checked our calculations by comparing the computed ECD spectra obtained separately with each of these effects.…”
supporting
confidence: 54%