2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0013091500001176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit Capelli Identities for Skew Symmetric Matrices

Abstract: The main purpose of this paper is to obtain an explicit Capelli identity relating skewsymmetric matrices under the action of the general linear group GL N . In particular, we give an explicit formula for the skew Capelli element in terms of the trace of powers of a matrix defined by the standard infinitesimal generators of GL N .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The symmetric analogues (2.4)/(2.5) are due to Gårding in 1948 [41]; see also [ [4]) is equivalent to a pfaffian, and see also [61,Corollary 3.13].…”
Section: Historical Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symmetric analogues (2.4)/(2.5) are due to Gårding in 1948 [41]; see also [ [4]) is equivalent to a pfaffian, and see also [61,Corollary 3.13].…”
Section: Historical Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, applications of the minor summation formula presented in [8] have been made in several directions, e.g., to study a certain limit law for shifted Schur measures in [33], to find an explicit description of the skew-Capelli identity in [17], and to generalize further the so-called Littlewood formulas, for instance in [11] (see also [2,9,10,13,14,21,27]), etc. Moreover, the formula has been generalized to the case of hyperpfaffians in [22] (see also [23]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , n − 1)] (16) which are the Capelli identities [2][3][4][5] of classical invariant theory [6][7][8], a field of research that, in more than a century, has remained active up to recent days (a forcerly incomplete selection of papers on the subject includes [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]). Because of this example, the correction term due to the presence of the matrix Q which appears in the non-commutative case is sometimes called the "quantum" correction with respect to the formula in the commutative case (2).…”
Section: The Cauchy-binet Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where B is a m × m matrix whose elements are supposed to commute with everything. Remark that, whenever B is invertible, 3 from (18) by multiplication of B −1 js and sum over j we get [(XB −1 ) is , Y kℓ ] = −A iℓ δ ks (19) which is of the form (17), and similarly by multiplication of B −1 sk and sum over k (20) and, as if X is row-pseudo-commutative also XB −1 is such, while if Y is columnpseudo-commutative also B −1 Y is such. Thus, quite trivially, Proposition 1.1 can be used to express, for example in the case (a)…”
Section: The Cauchy-binet Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%