2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-006-9004-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit constructions of separating hash families from algebraic curves over finite fields

Abstract: Let X be a set of order n and Y be a set of order m. An (n, m, {w 1 , w 2 })-separating hash family is a set F of N functions from X to Y such that for any X 1 , X 2 ⊆ X with X 1 ∩ X 2 = ∅, |X 1 | = w 1 and |X 2 | = w 2 , there exists an element f ∈ F such that f (X 1 ) ∩ f (X 2 ) = ∅. In this paper, we provide explicit constructions of separating hash families using algebraic curves over finite fields. In particular, applying the Garcia-Stichtenoth curves, we obtain an infinite class of explicitly constructed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1 : For the bounds of strong separating hash families, Sarkar and Stinson [22] proved that there exists an infinite class of SHF(N ; n, m, {1 w 1 , w 2 }) for which N is O((w 1 (w 1 + w 2 )) log * n log n). Liu and Shen [20] gave an infinite constructions of the SHF(N ; n, m, {1 w 1 , w 2 }) for which N is O(log n). Guo and Stinson [15] proved N ≥ n m−1 when w 1 ≥ m − 1 and w 1 + w 2 ≤ n ≤ 2(w 1 + w 2 ) − m. Now we compare our conclusion with the bound in [15].…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1 : For the bounds of strong separating hash families, Sarkar and Stinson [22] proved that there exists an infinite class of SHF(N ; n, m, {1 w 1 , w 2 }) for which N is O((w 1 (w 1 + w 2 )) log * n log n). Liu and Shen [20] gave an infinite constructions of the SHF(N ; n, m, {1 w 1 , w 2 }) for which N is O(log n). Guo and Stinson [15] proved N ≥ n m−1 when w 1 ≥ m − 1 and w 1 + w 2 ≤ n ≤ 2(w 1 + w 2 ) − m. Now we compare our conclusion with the bound in [15].…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For constant d, the (n, d)-universal set over Σ = {0, 1} constructed in [29] of size M = O(2 3d log n) (and in [30] of size M = 2 d+O(log 2 d) log n) is (n, (w, r))-CFF for any w and r of size O(log n). See also [23]. In [6], Bshouty gave the following locally explicit constructions of (n, (w, r))-CFF that can be constructed in (almost) linear time in their sizes (the third column in the table ).…”
Section: Cover-free Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], Liu and Shen provide an explicit constructions of (M ; n, q, (d 1 , d 2 )) separating hash families using algebraic curves over finite fields. They show that for infinite sequence of integers n there is an explicit (M ; n, q, (d 1 , d 2 )) separating hash families of size O(log n) for fixed d 1 and d 2 .…”
Section: Separating Hash Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For constant d, the (n, d)-universal set over Σ = {0, 1} constructed in [57] of size M = O(2 3d log n) (and in [58] of size M = 2 d+O(log 2 d) log n) is (n, (w, r))-CFF for any w and r of size O(log n). See also [48]. In [13], Bshouty gave the following locally explicit constructions of (n, (w, r))-CFF that can be constructed in (almost) linear time in their sizes (the third column in the table).…”
Section: Cover-free Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%