2014
DOI: 10.1002/nme.4824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit dynamics with a non‐local damage model using the thick level set approach

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(119 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In subsequent publications, the authors will build upon the current work in order to explore three new aspects: first, the consideration of an alternative residual-based dissipative mechanism widely known as Petrov-Galerkin stabilisation [40]; second, the consideration of non-isothermal materials [43] and third, an adaptation of the current computational framework to highstrain ductile fracture application [72] incorporating an alternative Updated Lagrangian formalism in the style of [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In subsequent publications, the authors will build upon the current work in order to explore three new aspects: first, the consideration of an alternative residual-based dissipative mechanism widely known as Petrov-Galerkin stabilisation [40]; second, the consideration of non-isothermal materials [43] and third, an adaptation of the current computational framework to highstrain ductile fracture application [72] incorporating an alternative Updated Lagrangian formalism in the style of [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we reinitialize by projecting the level-set field from all local minima, an approach that preserves the individual damage zones that represent cracks regardless of their proximity, until the damage gradient forces their coalescence. Another contribution is the time-independent softening constitutive model which allows for an exact level-set update in the explicit approach, whereas in a previous dynamic implementation, a delay-damage evolution model had been employed for the update [35]. We find that our specific choice of post-yield function achieves the expected fragmentation results while other constitutive models may not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…as a function of the residual function R and its derivative T , where [j] indicates the iteration number: (47) The iterative level-set update to bring the residual function to zero (44) can be seen as an implicit time integration of the level-set equation within each time-step:φ + φ ,xuφ = 0 whereφ = ∆φ/∆t is the extension velocity [36,35]. This Newton-Raphson solve represents a trade-off between high accuracy and computational expediency; one may limit the solve to one iteration per damage zone to minimize the computational cost of the non-local update or use additional iterations to further minimize the residual.…”
Section: Damage Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen from Figure 12, the crack speed is well bounded by the Rayleigh wave speed (here 0:7c R ), the theoretical limiting speed for an in-plane crack. It should be noted that this upper bound is rooted in the stability condition (7) and the energy balance (8), contrary to the thick level set approach [43] where this limiting speed is considered as an additional modeling parameter. The crack length is approximately 90 mm at t D 8 10 5 s when the crack is about to reach the boundary (cf.…”
Section: Edge-cracked Plate Under Shearing Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%