2017
DOI: 10.1111/ldrp.12137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit Instruction and Next Generation Science Standards Aligned Classrooms: A Fit or a Split?

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to discuss the use of explicit instruction in the curriculum area of science where non‐explicit approaches (e.g., discovery learning) are often used. While there has been a relative paucity of research on explicit instruction in science classrooms, we argue that explicit instruction, particularly when it is embedded within an inquiry approach aligned to the Next Generation Science Standards, has the potential to increase achievement in science for students with LD. Based on previ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IDEAS self-management strategy and other UDL materials featured explicit instruction then gradual removal of supports, consistent with the scaffolding Criswell (2012) identified as beneficial for secondary students and supportive of increasing cognitive load in chemistry and other science courses (Therrien, Benson, Hughes, & Morris, 2017). The procedural facilitator (i.e., the patterned boxes) used in this research was similar to visual diagrams, which Carlson et al (2003) stated could mediate students’ cognitive load.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The IDEAS self-management strategy and other UDL materials featured explicit instruction then gradual removal of supports, consistent with the scaffolding Criswell (2012) identified as beneficial for secondary students and supportive of increasing cognitive load in chemistry and other science courses (Therrien, Benson, Hughes, & Morris, 2017). The procedural facilitator (i.e., the patterned boxes) used in this research was similar to visual diagrams, which Carlson et al (2003) stated could mediate students’ cognitive load.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Explicit instruction (EI) is an instructional method supported by over 50 years of empirical research across content areas, grade levels, and ability levels (Riccomini et al, 2017; Therrien et al, 2017). In its simplest form, the explicit instruction lesson structure includes modeling (“I do”), guided practice (“we do”), and independent practice (“you do”).…”
Section: How To Use Edpuzzle To Enact Explicit Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We constructed lessons based on research on adolescent learning (Kamil et al, 2008), effective instruction for students with LD (Jitendra et al, 2004;Swanson & Deshler, 2003), and effective intervention for students who are ELL (Carlo et al, 2004;Hall et al, 2017), which includes active and interactive learning, cumulative introduction and maintenance, and ongoing formative assessment. Instructional design included essential components of explicit instruction as outlined by Hughes, Morris, Therrien, and Benson (2017). Specifically, instruction built understanding cumulatively across a series of lessons for each word set, teachers modeled usage of words across contexts and in writing, supports and prompts were faded as students gained skill with each word set, and students received ample opportunities for oral and written practice with feedback.…”
Section: Key Lesson Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%