2019
DOI: 10.1090/proc/14800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit upper bounds on the least primitive root

Abstract: We give a method for producing explicit bounds on g(p), the least primitive root modulo p. Using our method we show that g(p) < 2r 2 rω(p−1) p 1 4 + 1 4r for p > 10 56 where r ≥ 2 is an integer parameter. This result beats existing bounds that rely on explicit versions of the Burgess inequality. Our main result allows one to derive bounds of differing shapes for various ranges of p. For example, our method also allows us to show that

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While explicit upper bounds on g(p) have been given [4,5,10,15], we are unaware of any such bounds for h(p). Trivially, we have h(p) < p 2 , and, if we use an appropriate version of the Pólya-Vinogradov inequality [7], we can make the estimate h(p) < p 1+ǫ explicit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While explicit upper bounds on g(p) have been given [4,5,10,15], we are unaware of any such bounds for h(p). Trivially, we have h(p) < p 2 , and, if we use an appropriate version of the Pólya-Vinogradov inequality [7], we can make the estimate h(p) < p 1+ǫ explicit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%