1991
DOI: 10.3354/meps077119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploitation of arctic sea ice by epibenthic copepods

Abstract: The harpacticoid Tisbe furcata and the cyclopoid Cyclopina schneideri are the dominant ice meiofaunal copepods in Frobisher Bay, Canadian Arctic. Maximum concentrations of T furcata in the lower 5 cm of the ice exceed 250000 m-3. of C. schneideri 125000 m-3, and by late winter the 2 species are 103 to 104 more concentrated in the ice than in the water column below. In contrast, the 2 species appear during the ice-free season to b e relat~vely minor components of the nearshore system, living mainly in the epibe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These conclusions reinforce the fact that most stages of sympagic meiofauna utilize the sea ice as a nursery and feeding environment (Grainger 1991;Bluhm et al 2017Bluhm et al , 2018, irrespective of the additional habitats they are found in. Sympagic meiofauna species are often found in higher concentrations within the ice than in the pelagic or benthic zones (Carey and Montagna 1982;Grainger 1991;Bluhm et al 2017), meaning that losing ice cover could have a disproportionate impact even if the same taxa are found in other habitats. Losses and reductions of sea ice meiofauna have already been reported due to changes in ice dynamics (Melnikov et al 2001;Kiko et al 2017;Leasi et al 2021).…”
Section: Habitat Occurrence and Portion Of Life Cycle Spent Within Se...supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These conclusions reinforce the fact that most stages of sympagic meiofauna utilize the sea ice as a nursery and feeding environment (Grainger 1991;Bluhm et al 2017Bluhm et al , 2018, irrespective of the additional habitats they are found in. Sympagic meiofauna species are often found in higher concentrations within the ice than in the pelagic or benthic zones (Carey and Montagna 1982;Grainger 1991;Bluhm et al 2017), meaning that losing ice cover could have a disproportionate impact even if the same taxa are found in other habitats. Losses and reductions of sea ice meiofauna have already been reported due to changes in ice dynamics (Melnikov et al 2001;Kiko et al 2017;Leasi et al 2021).…”
Section: Habitat Occurrence and Portion Of Life Cycle Spent Within Se...supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Harpacticoida are mainly found in both sympagic and benthic habitats, while most Cyclopoida are found in sympagic-pelagic habitats (Fig. 2g) (Grainger et al 1985;Horner and Murphy 1985;Mohammed and Neuhof 1985;Grainger 1991;Carey 1992;Schünemann and Werner 2005). Most Nematoda are either only sympagic or sympagic-benthic (Fig.…”
Section: Habitat Occurrencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In our study we assumed that the sea-ice meiofauna exploited only bottom-ice algae as a food source (Grainger et al 1985, Grainger & Hsiao 1990, Grainger 1991. Turbellarians have been described as omnivores (McIntyre 1969), and have been shown to feed on ice algae .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the sea-ice meiofauna is believed to exploit this food source as well (Grainger et al 1985, Grainger & Hsiao 1990, Grainger 1991. Additionally, several pelagic species depend on released ice algae as early food in spring (Conover et al 1986, Runge & Ingram 1988.…”
Section: Grazing Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%