“…The concept of crystal design came to crystal chemistry recently but immediately led to rapid development of structural chemistry of different classes of substances with extended architectures such as coordination polymers of different periodicities (chain one-dimensional, layered two-dimensional, or framework three-dimensional). − This concept gained its theoretical basis from “reticular” chemistry, which is in turn based on the topological (graph) approach . Thus, topological properties of crystal structures became important and resulted in successful synthesis of large families of isoreticular metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). , It is the topological methods that enabled one to reveal many correlations of “chemical composition – structure – property”, which were then used in crystal design. ,− The main route of reticular chemistry in obtaining new coordination polymers includes utilizing structural units with predetermined topology and geometry (secondary building units, SBUs) for decoration of a particular topological motif (periodic net). − Importantly, this approach can be readily algorithmized and implemented into computer tools for analysis of crystal structures, their topological classification, and design of new crystalline compounds. − However, complicated compounds consisting of SBUs with a high degree of freedom and extended connection possibilities are still a challenge for crystal design. − This promoted inventing new structural descriptors and models that could reliably discriminate different topological motifs at both local and overall level, such as coordination figure, ligand coordination type symbol, − Hopf ring net, , net topological indices and tilings . These were formalized, digitalized, and computed for thousands of crystal structures from crystallographic databases such as the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD), Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD), or Pearson’s Crystal Database .…”