Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Future Energy Systems 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3077839.3077859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Appliance State Constraints to Improve Appliance State Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature reports few contributions for NILM algorithms applied to BLUED data at the same frequency of 1 Hz [13], [14], [18].…”
Section: Performance With Blued Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Literature reports few contributions for NILM algorithms applied to BLUED data at the same frequency of 1 Hz [13], [14], [18].…”
Section: Performance With Blued Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], clustering in ΔP -ΔQ plane is solved through a hierarchical approach executed with some manual supervision. The paper reports for phase-A BLUED data an F1-score for the event detection and for the appliance classification of about 92% and 88% respectively.…”
Section: Performance With Blued Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Event-based algorithms have a relatively fixed processing procedure, including event detection, feature extraction and event classification. To obtain accurate identification results, different classification techniques are tried, including k-means [27], k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) [28], naïve Bayes [29], maximum likelihood [30] and decision tree (DT) [31]. In [30] the maximum likelihood classifier is designed to disaggregate load based on the power profiles, but it only works for single-state loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Event-based algorithms have a relatively fixed processing procedure, including event detection, feature extraction and event classification. To obtain accurate identification results, different classification techniques are tried, including k-means [25], k-Nearest neighbour (k-NN) [26], naïve Bayes [27], maximum likelihood [28] and decision tree (DT) [29]. In [28] the maximum likelihood classifier is designed to disaggregate load based on the power profiles, but it only works for single-state loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%