Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/p19-1263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Explicit Paths for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension

Abstract: We propose a novel, path-based reasoning approach for the multi-hop reading comprehension task where a system needs to combine facts from multiple passages to answer a question. Although inspired by multi-hop reasoning over knowledge graphs, our proposed approach operates directly over unstructured text. It generates potential paths through passages and scores them without any direct path supervision. The proposed model, named PathNet, attempts to extract implicit relations from text through entity pair repres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 1, we show the results of the our proposed HDE graph based model on both development and test set and compare it with previously published results. We show that our proposed HDE graph based model improves the published state-of-the-art accuracy on development set from 67.1% (Kundu et al, 2018) to 68.1%, on the blind test set from 70.6% (Zhong et al, 2019) to 70.9%. Compared to the best single model "DynSAN" (unpublished) on WIKIHOP leaderboard, our proposed model is still 0.5% worse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Table 1, we show the results of the our proposed HDE graph based model on both development and test set and compare it with previously published results. We show that our proposed HDE graph based model improves the published state-of-the-art accuracy on development set from 67.1% (Kundu et al, 2018) to 68.1%, on the blind test set from 70.6% (Zhong et al, 2019) to 70.9%. Compared to the best single model "DynSAN" (unpublished) on WIKIHOP leaderboard, our proposed model is still 0.5% worse.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The study presented in this paper is directly related to existing research on multi-hop reading comprehension across multiple documents (Dhingra et al, 2018;Song et al, 2018;De Cao et al, 2018;Zhong et al, 2019;Kundu et al, 2018). The method presented in this paper is similar to previous studies using GNN for multi-hop reasoning (Song et al, 2018;De Cao et al, 2018).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the assistance of knowledge guidance, [19] enables the model to integrate the semantics of documents, but the approach is difficult to extend, since the external knowledge tends to be limited to a specific field. Focused on reasoning, [10] gathers all possible reasoning paths based on the entities contained in the documents, and then scores all paths to identify the correct one. However, this method would extract many invalid paths, thus bringing in interference and wasting the computing resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these limitations, this study abandons the current mainstream multi-hop inference methods based on document levels [6]- [8] or entity levels [9], [10]. Rather, it will choose to hop through sentences and gradually build an explicit path based on sentences, so as to deliver the jumps among semantics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%