2016
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1257604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting heterogeneous publicly available data sources for drug safety surveillance: computational framework and case studies

Abstract: This work contributes in establishing a continuous learning system for drug safety surveillance by exploiting heterogeneous publicly available data sources via appropriate support tools.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent focus has been on various aspects of causal assessment based on heterogeneous evidence. Some examples include work on aggregating human and animal data (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC), 2009), aggregation of spontaneous reports (Caster et al, 2017;Watson et al, 2018), Bayesian aggregation of safety trial data (Price et al, 2014) and data sets (Landes and Williamson, 2016), bringing together toxicology and epidemiology (Adami et al, 2011), retrieving but not assessing evidence Knowledge Base workgroup of the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, 2017; Koutkias et al, 2017), assessing the evidential force of data in terms of reproducibility and replicability of the research (LeBel et al, 2018), grading certainty of evidence of effects in studies (Alonso-Coello et al, 2016), grading observational studies based on study design (Sanderson et al, 2007;Sterne et al, 2016;Wells et al, 2018), thematic synthesis of qualitative research, decision making (Thomas and Harden, 2008;Landes, 2018), providing probability bounds for an adverse event being drug induced in an individual (Murtas et al, 2017) in Pearl's formal framework for causality (Pearl, 2000) and work on aggregating evidence generated by computational tools (Koutkias and Jaulent, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent focus has been on various aspects of causal assessment based on heterogeneous evidence. Some examples include work on aggregating human and animal data (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC), 2009), aggregation of spontaneous reports (Caster et al, 2017;Watson et al, 2018), Bayesian aggregation of safety trial data (Price et al, 2014) and data sets (Landes and Williamson, 2016), bringing together toxicology and epidemiology (Adami et al, 2011), retrieving but not assessing evidence Knowledge Base workgroup of the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, 2017; Koutkias et al, 2017), assessing the evidential force of data in terms of reproducibility and replicability of the research (LeBel et al, 2018), grading certainty of evidence of effects in studies (Alonso-Coello et al, 2016), grading observational studies based on study design (Sanderson et al, 2007;Sterne et al, 2016;Wells et al, 2018), thematic synthesis of qualitative research, decision making (Thomas and Harden, 2008;Landes, 2018), providing probability bounds for an adverse event being drug induced in an individual (Murtas et al, 2017) in Pearl's formal framework for causality (Pearl, 2000) and work on aggregating evidence generated by computational tools (Koutkias and Jaulent, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under-reporting of ADRs by patients in spontaneous reporting systems like the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) has also been observed, with only 20–33% of the minimum number of expected serious events being reported (Alatawi and Hansen, 2017 ). Consequently, several authors have reached to the conclusion that social media listening is an important tool to augment post-marketing safety surveillance (Powell et al, 2016 ; Koutkias et al, 2017 ). However, these authors consider that much work is needed to determine the best methods for using this data source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media platforms (mostly Twitter, DailyStrength.com, and dedicated patient forums) attracted recently major interest for DS. Exploiting KE activities like knowledge extraction in social media can add a valuable new data source in the DS ecosystem, as they are characterized by three interesting aspects (Koutkias et al, 2017): (a) they provide vast amounts of data, (b) posts could be monitored across time and trends could be identified in relation with triggering events (e.g., new safety issues reported by regulatory authorities or announced in the media), and (c) user interconnections (e.g., mentions, responses, followership, etc.) could create a “social graph” which could provide useful insights through graph-based Social Network Analysis (SNA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%