2018
DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting microvariation: How to make the best of your incomplete data

Abstract: In this article we discuss the use of big corpuses or databases as a first step for qualitative analysis of linguistic data. We concentrate on ASIt, the Syntactic Atlas of Italy, and take into consideration the different types of dialectal data that can be collected from similar corpora and databases. We analyze all the methodological problems derived from the necessary compromise between the strict requirements imposed by a scientific inquiry and the management of big amounts of data. As a possible solution, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is hard to document slow changes, especially in the absence of recorded data; this luxury is available for Amharic and Romance, but not for many other languages. In the absence of historical documents, researchers have relied on other means, such as computational modelling of change (see Baker, 2008;Kirby, 2017, for overviews), microvariation across dialects (e.g., Brandner, 2012;Garzonio & Poletto, 2018), or child language data (Lightfoot, 1991(Lightfoot, , 1999Yang, 2003Yang, , 2016. In this paper, we propose a novel testbed for language change phenomena: minority or heritage languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hard to document slow changes, especially in the absence of recorded data; this luxury is available for Amharic and Romance, but not for many other languages. In the absence of historical documents, researchers have relied on other means, such as computational modelling of change (see Baker, 2008;Kirby, 2017, for overviews), microvariation across dialects (e.g., Brandner, 2012;Garzonio & Poletto, 2018), or child language data (Lightfoot, 1991(Lightfoot, , 1999Yang, 2003Yang, , 2016. In this paper, we propose a novel testbed for language change phenomena: minority or heritage languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. incomplete data" (Garzonio and Poletto 2018) and accept the limits of tools designed more than a century ago. A quantitative perspective, in my opinion, is the safest way to revive the data contained in atlases such as the AIS and ALF by limiting possible biases that are intrinsic to traditional dialectological enterprises.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…III, pp. 130-338;Garzonio 2008;Garzonio and Poletto 2018;Dagnac 2015;Palasis 2015;Pescarini and Donzelli 2017;Poletto and Oliviéri 2018;Guilliot and Becerra-Zita 2019). Even though many studies have been carried out on the topic in recent times, "there are still too many unidentified factors that might play a role in the doubling mechanism" (Poletto 2016, p. 837).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to statistics, Garzonio and Poletto (2018) suggest that associations between syntactic variables can be tentatively established on the basis of syntactic isoglosses. In particular, they argue that when the area of diffusion of phenomenon A is contained in the area of diffusion of phenomenon B, then one can conclude that "the phenomenon that is more largely represented is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the occurrence of the second".…”
Section: No Gap Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%