2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icdm.2019.00062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Multi-domain Visual Information for Fake News Detection

Abstract: The increasing popularity of social media promotes the proliferation of fake news. With the development of multimedia technology, fake news attempts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, the work in [62] rely only on visual information but trains in parallel different CNNs operating both in the pixel domain and in the frequency domain. The authors in fact conjecture that frequency-based features can capture different image qualities and compressions potentially due to repeated upload and download from multiple platforms, while pixel-based features can express semantic characteristics of images belonging to fake composite objects.…”
Section: Methods Based On a Reference Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the work in [62] rely only on visual information but trains in parallel different CNNs operating both in the pixel domain and in the frequency domain. The authors in fact conjecture that frequency-based features can capture different image qualities and compressions potentially due to repeated upload and download from multiple platforms, while pixel-based features can express semantic characteristics of images belonging to fake composite objects.…”
Section: Methods Based On a Reference Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these features are manually crafted and just learn simple patterns, hardly applying to real images. Qi et al (2019) design a CNN-based model to capture image patterns, but their model only works in the case of large samples. So the applicable scope is very limited.…”
Section: Unimodal Fake News Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, except for texts in tweets, the methods mentioned above all focus on characteristics of images at the semantic level (e.g., emotional provocations), which can be reflected in the spatial domain. However, these methods ignore the individual information of fake images at the physical level, e.g., re-compression artifacts, which is reflected in the frequency domain (Qi et al, 2019). Third, some models (Wang et al, 2018;Khattar et al, 2019) obtain fused representations by simply concatenating multi-modality features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this advantage is also taken by fake news which usually contains misrepresented or even tampered images to attract and mislead readers for rapid dissemination. As a result, visual content has become an important part of fake news that can not be neglected [37]. image is an artwork done so beautifully that it is hard to distinguish from reality.…”
Section: Visual Content-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Misleading images refer to fake news images that have not experienced any manipulation, but as described in a figure the content is misleading. Generally, these misleading photos come from artworks or obsolete pictures that are released at an early event [37].…”
Section: Visual Content-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%