2023
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10050534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Patch Sizes and Resolutions for Multi-Scale Deep Learning in Mammogram Image Classification

Abstract: Recent progress in deep learning (DL) has revived the interest on DL-based computer aided detection or diagnosis (CAD) systems for breast cancer screening. Patch-based approaches are one of the main state-of-the-art techniques for 2D mammogram image classification, but they are intrinsically limited by the choice of patch size, as there is no unique patch size that is adapted to all lesion sizes. In addition, the impact of input image resolution on performance is not yet fully understood. In this work, we stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to their tiny sizes (e.g., 100 × 100 pixels in 4000 × 3000 images), 3 keeping the high semantic details of the lesion is crucial to efficiently identify their morphology and associate a risk of malignancy. [16][17][18] On the contrary, degrading pixel information may lead to the creation of noise or bright artifacts that can be confused with MCs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to their tiny sizes (e.g., 100 × 100 pixels in 4000 × 3000 images), 3 keeping the high semantic details of the lesion is crucial to efficiently identify their morphology and associate a risk of malignancy. [16][17][18] On the contrary, degrading pixel information may lead to the creation of noise or bright artifacts that can be confused with MCs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors conclude that a single size or resolution is not optimal for catching all lesions. 17 They combined patch classifiers of several sizes to generate the global image risk of malignancy prediction. All those methods focus on the image classification task.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tamanhos menores levaram à perda de informac ¸ões relevantes, devido à falta de contexto significativo, comprometendo assim a capacidade de capturar características distintivas da região e resultando em uma representac ¸ão inadequada. Por outro lado, tamanhos maiores resultaram em uma extrac ¸ão limitada de patches, comprometendo a capacidade do modelo em capturar detalhes finos presentes na região [Quintana et al 2023]. Durante a extrac ¸ão foram descartados patches com menos de 30% de pixels pertencentes a ROI, garantindo uma representac ¸ão mais robusta e informativa da região.…”
Section: Extrac ¸ãO De Patchesunclassified
“…TP denotes the number of correctly classified positive samples, TN denotes the number of correctly classified negative samples, FP denotes the number of samples incorrectly classified as positive, FN denotes the number of samples incorrectly classified as negative. Quintana et al (2023), a patch classifier is trained and then is extended to the whole image classifier. A multi-patch size and a multi-resolution approach are proposed to classify whole images as cancer and no cancer.…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%