“…Earlier magneto-structural correlation predicts that the Gd–Gd exchange is expected to be ferromagnetic only when the Gd–O–Gd angle lies in the range of 105–135° and here all of the angles are found to lie outside this range and, therefore, expected to be antiferromagnetic as computed from DFT calculations. , The earlier observed parabolic behavior suggests that a lower angle would yield strong antiferromagnetic Gd···Gd interactions, which is observed here with J 1 > J 3 ≫ J 2 . This is essentially due to weak ferromagnetic contribution J s that arise due to charge-transfer interaction to the 5d/6s orbital and weak but non-negligible 4f–4f orbital overlap that tends to get larger both in acute and wider angles, as illustrated earlier. , As the simulation of susceptibility for this cluster is not possible using the exact diagonalization method, we have adopted a fragment approach and have considered the {Gd5} fragment interacting with a {Gd4} fragment employing DFT J s . This is found to reproduce the experimental susceptibility, offering confidence in the methodology chosen.…”