“…In our study, we provided important SARs of indole derivatives and, thus, explored these as a novel molecular–structural class of MCT1 inhibitors. We obtained compounds with higher inhibitory potency compared to a significant fraction of the ∼100 reported MCT1 inhibitors in the literature, − including pteridine derivatives, most coumarin derivatives, and many cinnamic acid derivatives including reference compound 8 . ,, Nevertheless, many earlier reported MCT1 inhibitors have demonstrated inhibition concentrations significantly below the determined IC 50 values as found within our work, including thieno[2,3- d ]pyrimidin-2,4-diones, , pyrrolo[3,4- d ]pyridazinones, or 7 as well as many cinnamic acid derivatives. , However, three aspects have to be considered to put the bioactivity profile of indole derivatives into the right perspective: - As MCT1 inhibitors are barely known with only roughly 100 representatives in the literature, − no standardized assay procedures have been developed compared to methodologically better-explored protein (super)families, as, for example, ABC transporters. ,,− ,,, This led to rather diverse assay setups with a minor number of independent confirmatory studies to determine functional compound bioactivities, limiting the overall comparability of data. These diverse assays included nonfunctional MTT-based cell viability assays, ,, pH-dependent functional fluorescence assays, functional radiotracer assays [ e.g.
…”