2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2017.7966230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting the use of recurrent neural networks for driver behavior profiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Jozefowicz and colleagues 21 showed that for a great class of problems, GRU outperformed LSTM. Their study is also corroborated by Carvalho and colleagues 22 , were GRU units showed lower dispersion than LSTM on the results.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Furthermore, Jozefowicz and colleagues 21 showed that for a great class of problems, GRU outperformed LSTM. Their study is also corroborated by Carvalho and colleagues 22 , were GRU units showed lower dispersion than LSTM on the results.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…To verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed driving error detection framework, we tested it on a high‐quality open dataset of driving errors created by Ferreira Júnior and utilized in many similar studies (Carvalho et al, ; Júnior et al, ). This dataset contains smartphone sensor measurements captured while performing seven different types of driving events.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with larger databases, it can be expected that Deep Learning techniques offer higher recognition results. In fact, in a later work by the same authors (Carvalho et al [ 2 ]) they use the same database to apply Deep Learning and to compare the benefits with different RNN schemes. In their empirical evaluation, the gated recurrent unit (GRU) was the most reliable RNN to be deployed with the accelerometer data; the long short-term memory (LSTM) and the simple RNN have a greater difference depending on the numbers of neurons.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must point out that the estimation of this principal direction of vehicle movement can be considered equivalent to a calibration process, which can be found in many driving characterization research papers, to map phone coordinates into vehicle reference coordinates. Carvalho et al [ 2 ] and Lu et al [ 3 ] perform this transformation from a smartphone’s coordinate system to a vehicle’s coordinate system. Also, it is mentioned in Kanarachos et al [ 4 ], where this reorientation is carried out by fusing the accelerometer, the gyroscope and the magnetometer signals and calculating the Euler rotation angles, or only with the accelerometer and magnetometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%