2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2019.8793829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Trademark Databases for Robotic Object Fetching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, it is not suitable for the keypoints detection since we need to label the semantic keypoints accurately, which is a challenging task for real images. To overcome this problem, some researchers have used synthesizing datasets [5][6][7] and produced ground truth labels [8,9]. Some researchers use unlabeled data [10,11] in object detection, but the methods are not applicable to our keypoints detection problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, it is not suitable for the keypoints detection since we need to label the semantic keypoints accurately, which is a challenging task for real images. To overcome this problem, some researchers have used synthesizing datasets [5][6][7] and produced ground truth labels [8,9]. Some researchers use unlabeled data [10,11] in object detection, but the methods are not applicable to our keypoints detection problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning methods are known to be robust, but their implementations are based on huge amounts of training data, and require intensive manual work for labeling the datasets. To overcome this limitation, it is desirable to have approaches for synthesizing datasets for training [3]- [6] and producing label data [7] [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their final evaluation obtained better results using object detection frameworks based on two stages than frameworks based on one stage and segmentation networks. Song & Kurniawati [29] also compared the same types of object detection frameworks (two-stage and one-stage). They also evaluated a training base composition with only synthetic data, real data, and synthetic data.…”
Section: Logo Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%