“…11-13 to 11-14. Although there is no report yet of a P2Y 14 R X-ray crystallographic structure, we have applied a structure-guided approach using homology modeling and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to the design of new antagonist ligands. ,, The nucleotide agonist-bound P2Y 12 R structure serves as a suitable protein template for P2Y 14 R homology, with 44% sequence identity between P2Y 12 R and P2Y 14 R. ,, Previous studies have analyzed the structure–activity relationship (SAR) of high affinity antagonist 4-[4-(4-piperidinyl)phenyl]-7-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2-naphthalene-carboxylic acid (PPTN, 1a , Chart ) and its analogues, e.g., potent N -acetyl derivative 1b and triazole derivatives 3a , 4 , and 5 . ,,,,, Compound 1a is a highly selective antagonist for the P2Y 14 R among the family of eight P2YRs; this chemical series has no evidence of an interaction with other P2YRs or of residual receptor agonism. , Therefore, we consider this to be a viable, high affinity scaffold for the design of new P2Y 14 R antagonists. As a screening tool, we previously introduced a high affinity fluorescent antagonist 2 , which shows a functional K i of 80 pM and serves as a versatile screening tool in a flow cytometry assay using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells overexpressing the human (h) P2Y 14 R and human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells overexpressing the mouse (m) P2Y 14 R. ,, Consistently reproducible IC 50 values can be obtained for newly synthesized antagonists, although these inhibitory constants underestimate the compounds’ affinity by at least one order of magnitude …”