2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2ma00385f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of charge transport materials to improve the radiation tolerance of lead halide perovskite solar cells

Abstract: Towards the application of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) in space, we extensively investigated the effects of electron beam irradiation on binary-mixed PSCs with various hole- and electron-transport materials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in this case the perovskite QFLS remains almost unchanged while the Si absorber shows a high variation (0.40 V) which is in line with the losses shown by the perovskite/Si architecture. Interestingly, values of n (Figure f) change only slightly for both light harvesters (in particular, in Si n < 1 for both pristine and irradiated devices because of Auger recombination which is known to be the dominant recombination mechanism in Si-based SCs) and for the perovskite/Si stack (from 2.55 to 2.50), confirming once again the radiation tolerance of MHPs (and PSCs in general), as also demonstrated by other literature results. …”
Section: Radiation Resistance Of Metal Halide Perovskitessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Even in this case the perovskite QFLS remains almost unchanged while the Si absorber shows a high variation (0.40 V) which is in line with the losses shown by the perovskite/Si architecture. Interestingly, values of n (Figure f) change only slightly for both light harvesters (in particular, in Si n < 1 for both pristine and irradiated devices because of Auger recombination which is known to be the dominant recombination mechanism in Si-based SCs) and for the perovskite/Si stack (from 2.55 to 2.50), confirming once again the radiation tolerance of MHPs (and PSCs in general), as also demonstrated by other literature results. …”
Section: Radiation Resistance Of Metal Halide Perovskitessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A surface passivation layer was prepared by spin‐coating an isopropyl alcohol (IPA) solution of (TAMT)I 3 or (TAT)I 3 (0.5–3.0 mg mL −1 ) on a binary mixed perovskite (BMP) film composed of MA 0.13 FA 0.87 PbI 2.61 Br 0.39 [MABr (or PbBr 2 ):FAI (or PbI 2 ) = 0.13:0.87]. [ 41 ] As a control, a BMP film sample, spin‐coated with only IPA, was also prepared. The surface structures of BMP were evaluated by 2D grazing‐incidence X‐Ray diffraction (2D‐GIXRD).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These energy levels are suitable for the HTL (doped Spiro-OMeTAD in the present case), which transports holes through the cascade energy profile and blocks electrons from the binary mixed perovskite (PVK) of MA 0.13 FA 0.87 PbI 2.61 Br 0.39 [MABr (or PbBr 2 ):FAI (or PbI 2 ) = 0.13:0.87, where MA is methylammonium cation and FA is formamidinium cation]. 56 Although syn-and anti-PMs have almost identical frontier orbitals and electronic structure, the molecular symmetries of syn-and anti-PMs are different. C i symmetric anti-PM has a center of symmetry, but C 2 symmetric syn-PM has chirality without a center of symmetry, as evident from its chiral column chart (Figure S17 in Analytical Data).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LUMO levels were calculated by adding the optical band gap (2.90 eV for both PMs), giving −2.53 and −2.45 eV for syn - and anti -PMs, respectively. These energy levels are suitable for the HTL (doped Spiro-OMeTAD in the present case), which transports holes through the cascade energy profile and blocks electrons from the binary mixed perovskite (PVK) of MA 0.13 FA 0.87 PbI 2.61 Br 0.39 [MABr (or PbBr 2 ):FAI (or PbI 2 ) = 0.13:0.87, where MA is methylammonium cation and FA is formamidinium cation] . Although syn - and anti -PMs have almost identical frontier orbitals and electronic structure, the molecular symmetries of syn - and anti -PMs are different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%