2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac94d
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of Cosmic-ray Acceleration in Protostellar Accretion Shocks and a Model for Ionization Rates in Embedded Protoclusters

Abstract: We construct a model for cosmic ray acceleration from protostellar accretion shocks and calculate the resulting cosmic ray ionization rate within star-forming molecular clouds. We couple a protostar cluster model with an analytic accretion shock model to calculate the cosmic ray acceleration from protostellar surfaces. We present the cosmic ray flux spectrum from keV to GeV energies for a typical low-mass protostar. We find that at the shock surface the spectrum follows a power-law trend across 6 orders of mag… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once a protostar is much more massive than ∼3 M , its luminosity becomes dominated by the stellar photosphere rather than accretion (Palla & Stahler 1993;Offner & McKee 2011). The inferred accretion rates are sufficiently high to produce significant cosmic-ray ionization, as predicted by Padovani et al (2016) and Gaches & Offner (2018), even if the current luminosity of HOPS-108 is as low as 37 L . Thus, it remains possible that the protostellar accretion, even though not from a high-mass star, could be driving the chemistry through local production of energetic particles or photons as suggested by Ceccarelli et al (2014).…”
Section: The Luminosity and Ultimate Mass Of Hops-108mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once a protostar is much more massive than ∼3 M , its luminosity becomes dominated by the stellar photosphere rather than accretion (Palla & Stahler 1993;Offner & McKee 2011). The inferred accretion rates are sufficiently high to produce significant cosmic-ray ionization, as predicted by Padovani et al (2016) and Gaches & Offner (2018), even if the current luminosity of HOPS-108 is as low as 37 L . Thus, it remains possible that the protostellar accretion, even though not from a high-mass star, could be driving the chemistry through local production of energetic particles or photons as suggested by Ceccarelli et al (2014).…”
Section: The Luminosity and Ultimate Mass Of Hops-108mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition to the photometric, radio, and [OI] studies, FIR4 presents a diverse array of line emission from molecules that may be indicative of chemical processes driven by a source of locally generated energetic particles (i.e., cosmic rays) or photons that are catalysts for chemistry (Ceccarelli et al 2014;Gaches & Offner 2018). Most studies of this region, however, have been conducted at resolutions ≥3 , which are insufficient to resolve the protostars completely from their environment (Favre et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They estimated the initial H 2 OPR in the preshock gas being close to 1. Note, accreting protostars can accelerate cosmic rays, and the ionization rate in the surrounding cloud may be comparable or even higher than due to Galactic cosmic rays (Podio et al 2014;Padovani et al 2016;Gaches & Offner 2018). At high cosmic ray ionization rate, ζ 10 −14 s −1 , the steady-state H 2 OPR in the preshock gas is close to 1.…”
Section: Physical Conditions In the Preshock Gasmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Clouds with significant CR ionisation are also correspondingly warmer (Bisbas et al, 2017;Gaches and Offner, 2018). The CR pressure is dynamically negligible (Gaches and Offner, 2018); however, the resulting elevated temperatures of 30 − 50 K increase the thermal pressure, which in turn may make it more difficult to form stars. However, it is worth noting that molecular gas is not necessarily a prerequisite for star formation (Krumholz, 2012).…”
Section: Molecular Chemistry and Gas Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%