2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-013-9186-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of Predictors of Teaching Effectiveness: The Professor’s Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Creswell et al (1990), faculty members expect their chair to act as an advocate for their professional development. Faculty members are motivated to engage in productive behaviours based on several different factors, including self-motivation (Conley & Önder, 2014) and motivational support from their department chair (Monteiro et al, 2013). Department chairs help to create reward systems and distribute resources, which in turn enables faculty members to work toward meeting their goals (Miller et al, 2016).…”
Section: Faculty Member -Academic Chair Lmxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Creswell et al (1990), faculty members expect their chair to act as an advocate for their professional development. Faculty members are motivated to engage in productive behaviours based on several different factors, including self-motivation (Conley & Önder, 2014) and motivational support from their department chair (Monteiro et al, 2013). Department chairs help to create reward systems and distribute resources, which in turn enables faculty members to work toward meeting their goals (Miller et al, 2016).…”
Section: Faculty Member -Academic Chair Lmxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chair role, as the primary front-line academic administrator, is faced with a wide variety of challenges and opportunities. Monteiro et al (2013) noted that unlike other academic administrative positions, the front-line administrator's success is often linked to external variables such as employers, accrediting agencies, potential student pipelines, and program review bodies. Consistent with that contention is the Czech and Forward (2010) argument that chairs have been perceived to be more effective when they use the communication strategies of empathy, equality, spontaneity, and problem orientation in working with their faculty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%