2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of relationships between safety performance and unsafe behavior in the Chinese oil industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
22
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The first approach has been criticized due to its reactive nature and the fact that it cannot provide early warning information to empower authorities to take action prior to accidents. Thus, there has been a shift towards using leading indicators, such as unsafe behaviors, to more effectively measure the regulatory alignment and secure traffic safety goals [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach has been criticized due to its reactive nature and the fact that it cannot provide early warning information to empower authorities to take action prior to accidents. Thus, there has been a shift towards using leading indicators, such as unsafe behaviors, to more effectively measure the regulatory alignment and secure traffic safety goals [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study that examined the safety climate level among copper production unit employees, the safety climate level was moderate [15]. Measurement of the Chinese industries' safety climate revealed that China's oil and gas industry's safety climate was low [7]. Aliabadi et al assessed the country's sugar industry's safety climate and safety culture as weak [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, it emphasizes employees' shared understanding of policies, procedures, practices, the overall importance, and real priority of safety in the work environment, which leads to changes in safety improvement [5]. Research on the effect of psychological and organizational factors on behavioral risks and the possibility of injury in the work environment has shown that the safety climate significantly impacts these factors [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the BS, low productivity is a result of physical and EE ( Borritz et al, 2010 ; Tavella et al, 2020 ), which, in turn, contribute to high levels of employee absenteeism ( Zhang and Feng, 2011 ). In addition, employee attrition ( Van Bogaert et al, 2010 ; Schaufeli et al, 2009 ; Tong et al, 2020 ) earlier departure from work ( Bosqued, 2008 ), poor performance, production errors ( Ross, 1993 ), and quality issues ( Srivastava and Barmola, 2011 ; Dai et al, 2021 ). Work relationships can be deteriorated because of cynicism ( Rubio, 2003 ; Ahola et al, 2012 ; Tavella et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%