2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ce00929a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of relative π-electron localization in naphthalene aromatic rings by C–H⋯π interactions: experimental evidence, computational criteria, and database analysis

Abstract: In C–H⋯π interaction, the relative π-electron localization in aromatic ring led to the change of contact position from centre to edges of the ring (C–H⋯πe) which was confirmed by experimental evidences, computational criteria, and database analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, a comparison of the ligand geometries in the investigated MOFs reveals that the disorder of the TPE core and one external phenylene ring in 1-F is analogous to that of 1 , which means that the fluorine atoms exert minor intramolecular steric effects on the relative changes of ligand geometry in the case of the noncontracted networks (see Figure S22). Furthermore, looking into the type of intermolecular interactions between subframeworks in 1 and 1-F , the crystal structures show the presence of several weak π···H–C arom and F···H–C arom interactions (characteristic distances from 2.09 to 2.84 Å). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a comparison of the ligand geometries in the investigated MOFs reveals that the disorder of the TPE core and one external phenylene ring in 1-F is analogous to that of 1 , which means that the fluorine atoms exert minor intramolecular steric effects on the relative changes of ligand geometry in the case of the noncontracted networks (see Figure S22). Furthermore, looking into the type of intermolecular interactions between subframeworks in 1 and 1-F , the crystal structures show the presence of several weak π···H–C arom and F···H–C arom interactions (characteristic distances from 2.09 to 2.84 Å). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intramolecular interaction between keto and enol inside the CUR molecule is presented with a green color in Figure c. The main intermolecular interactions of O–H···O (magenta), C–H···O (blue), and C–H···π (yellow) , between the two molecules also represented in Figures c. Correspondingly, formation of hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl functional groups of PYR and the keto fragment of CUR was one of the main reasons for the cocrystal formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There are extended noncovalent, π-π, interactions between parallel Bpy rings on adjacent chains with a separation of 3.984 Å. 38 The asymmetric unit contains [(BPy) 2 MnCl 2 ] and water molecules, which are connected with intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Table 3), forming three-dimensional network (Olw-O21 2.775 (8) Å) (Figure 1B). Also, the water molecule interacts with the chloride ligands (Olw-CI 3.293 (3) and 3.258 (3) Å).…”
Section: Dft Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%