2021
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac129c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of the entropy due to the nano–encapsulated phase change materials (NEPCMs) within oblique prismatic containers

Abstract: The finite element treatments (FEM) together with the characteristic-based split (CBS) scheme are applied to examine the entropy generation and convective flow due to the presence of the nanoencapsulated phase change materials (NEPCMs) confined an inclined prismatic containers. The enclosure is filled with elements of a porous medium (glass balls) and a sine formula is considered for the latent heat of the phase change. A combination of the shell and core heat capacity is assumed to formulate the overall heat … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One major inconsistency that most PCMs are affected by is their intrinsic poor heat conductivities, which poses a detrimental effect on the TES system's response rates to the periodic energy storage/retrieval activities. Previous research identifies two major steps for overcoming this problem: (i) employing an adequate heat-transfer enhancer such as metal/graphite matrix, honeycomb, fin, nano-encapsulated phase-change materials (NEPCMs) [5][6][7], and heat pipe structures and (ii) using an efficient casing design to house the PCM so that a superior heat communication between the HTF and the PCM can be achieved [8,9]. Modifying the casing design by attaching fins to the thermally active walls is regarded as one of the most efficient approaches for intensifying the thermal responsiveness of energy storage systems [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major inconsistency that most PCMs are affected by is their intrinsic poor heat conductivities, which poses a detrimental effect on the TES system's response rates to the periodic energy storage/retrieval activities. Previous research identifies two major steps for overcoming this problem: (i) employing an adequate heat-transfer enhancer such as metal/graphite matrix, honeycomb, fin, nano-encapsulated phase-change materials (NEPCMs) [5][6][7], and heat pipe structures and (ii) using an efficient casing design to house the PCM so that a superior heat communication between the HTF and the PCM can be achieved [8,9]. Modifying the casing design by attaching fins to the thermally active walls is regarded as one of the most efficient approaches for intensifying the thermal responsiveness of energy storage systems [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%