2022
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2143004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of the Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Coordination Dynamics on Team Effectiveness in Human-Machine Teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overly stable team coordination dynamics have been associated with rigidity in other dynamic team environments, such as Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (Demir et al, 2018), which may have been detrimental to the performance given the dynamic nature of the USAR simulation. In the current task, we believe this indicates that the dynamic nature of the USAR task environment requires the ASIs to adaptively switch between different communication and coordination patterns that are distinct yet moderately stable discovered by Demir et al, 2019, 2022.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overly stable team coordination dynamics have been associated with rigidity in other dynamic team environments, such as Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (Demir et al, 2018), which may have been detrimental to the performance given the dynamic nature of the USAR simulation. In the current task, we believe this indicates that the dynamic nature of the USAR task environment requires the ASIs to adaptively switch between different communication and coordination patterns that are distinct yet moderately stable discovered by Demir et al, 2019, 2022.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Overly stable team coordination dynamics have been associated with rigidity in other dynamic team environments, such as Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (Demir et al, 2018), which may have been detrimental to the performance given the dynamic nature of the USAR simulation. In the current task, we believe this indicates that the dynamic nature of the USAR task environment requires the ASIs to adaptively switch between different communication and coordination patterns that are distinct yet moderately stable discovered by Demir et al, 2019Demir et al, , 2022 This study has several limitations, including the generalizability of the findings from a sample of university students operating in a game-based USAR environment to trained experts operating in real-world settings. Although the task environment for this study was designed to emulate key elements of real world USAR, it is not a high-resolution substitute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Various Wizard-of-Oz experiments (e.g., Demir et al, 2023;Schelble et al, 2022) in which humans believed to work with an AI, demonstrated that solely the perception of dealing with a non-human team member can influence interactions. In the study by , only the manipulated description of the type of team member (e.g., AI versus human) led to less coordination (i.e., less active planning) and, consequently, worse performance.…”
Section: The Distinct Nature Of Coordination In Hatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model dynamically combines the task grouping ideas extended by humans and the AI model via negotiation, fostering a better cohesive mental model among teammates. Concurrently, in [44], the authors explored the importance of achieving a common, meaningful, and timely understanding of the context in which humans and machines act and interact. The study investigated how AI-related approaches of belief and reasoning based on ontologies can enable knowledge sharing among all team members, both human and machine, thereby attaining a high level of interoperability between heterogeneous entities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%