Volume 8A: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering 2018
DOI: 10.1115/imece2018-88078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of Variable Conductance Effects During Input and Extraction of Heat From Phase Change Thermal Storage

Abstract: Previous efforts to model the effectiveness of heat input and extraction from a thermal storage unit have generally been based on the definition of a constant conductance of heat from the working fluid to the phase change storage material. In order to capture the effects of changing thermal resistance between the working fluid and melt front location, this paper presents a method using a resistor network analogy to account for thermal conductance as a function of melt fraction. This expression for thermal cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to steady-state effectiveness-NTU predictions, we found that the effectiveness of high performance devices is not sensitive to variations in conductance [24]. Those findings justified the use of a space-and time-averaged conductance, which we determined from a simple thermal resistance network as a function of the phase change material melt fraction [25]. In tandem, the TES device was examined in the context of a larger subsystem, consisting of external heat exchangers used to transfer energy to and from the storage.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to steady-state effectiveness-NTU predictions, we found that the effectiveness of high performance devices is not sensitive to variations in conductance [24]. Those findings justified the use of a space-and time-averaged conductance, which we determined from a simple thermal resistance network as a function of the phase change material melt fraction [25]. In tandem, the TES device was examined in the context of a larger subsystem, consisting of external heat exchangers used to transfer energy to and from the storage.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For the geometry given in Table 1, natural convection is not present. As noted in the introduction, previous work has been used to derive U [24,25]. The more elegant of these results will be used, namely that the overall heat transfer coefficient, U, can be found from the device geometry (A t , A w , h s ), thermophysical properties (k s ), convective coefficient, h, and the melt fraction, x e , which is a function of position in the device as well as time:…”
Section: Heat Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the geometry given in Table 1, natural convection is not present. As noted in the introduction, previous work has been used to derive U [7,8]. The more elegant of these results will be used, namely that the overall heat transfer coefficient, U, can be found from the device geometry (A t , A w , h s ), thermophysical properties (k s ), convective coefficient, h, and the melt fraction, x e , which is a function of position in the device as well as time:…”
Section: Model Transport Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology and results that are presented in this paper are built upon a larger body of work from this group over the last several years [6][7][8][9][10]. The first of these contains the derivation of a non-dimensional framework developed in order to analyze thermal energy storage technology [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation