Explorations in Mixed Reality with Learning and Teaching Frameworks: Lessons from Ludus and the Vulcan Academy

Grant, Gary; Della-Bosca, Daniel; Patterson, Dale; Prenzler, Shane; Roberts, Scott

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15620-6_5

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If the constructs of TAM rated higher it would theoretically indicate a high level of actual use for the HMD-AR warfarin counselling guide to be probable. 10,18,19 BI is the strongest indicator of actual use and the average score for the HMD-AR warfarin counselling guide was near neutral. 10 This would mean high levels of actual use would be unlikely for the HMD-AR warfarin counselling guide in its current form.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Several other constructs (SN, AT and BI) had in comparison to PEU less positive average Likert‐scores and would have also contributed to a reduction in potential for actual use according to the theory of TAM. If the constructs of TAM rated higher it would theoretically indicate a high level of actual use for the HMD‐AR warfarin counselling guide to be probable 10,18,19 . BI is the strongest indicator of actual use and the average score for the HMD‐AR warfarin counselling guide was near neutral 10 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing the acceptance of augmented‐reality and head‐mounted display in medicine counselling

Prenzler

Anoopkumar‐Dukie

Grant

2022

Pharmacy Practice and Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Both head‐mounted display (HMD) and augmented reality (AR) are examples of emergent and disruptive technologies that have had little exposure in pharmacy. The developed HMD‐AR warfarin counselling guide allowed pharmacists to examine this technology in a familiar context. Aims To determine acceptance among pharmacists for the HMD‐AR warfarin counselling guide, as a form of emergent and disruptive technology. Methods Forty Australian community pharmacists were recruited for a cohort study. The study was completed in a pre‐ and post‐test manner, where pharmacists were allowed to explore the HMD‐AR warfarin counselling guide. The pre‐test included questions related to demographic variables. The post‐test used Technology Assessment Model (TAM) based Likert scale questions on a 1–5 (strongly agree to strongly disagree) scale. Questions unrelated to TAM were also included in the pre‐ and post‐test and compared using a Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. These engaged participants on perceived usefulness of the HMD‐AR warfarin counselling guide and their willingness to use technology. Qualitative feedback to open ended questions in the post‐test was also sought. Results Technology Assessment Model constructs (perceived ease‐of‐use, perceived usefulness, and behavioural intention) indicated a positive reception overall. Pre‐ and post‐test questions regarding perceived usefulness of the HMD‐AR warfarin counselling guide and willingness to use technology declined after using the HMD‐AR warfarin counselling guide. Conclusion Participant expectations although still positive, declined after using the HMD‐AR warfarin counselling guide. Further study is needed for technological advances, design optimisation and to assess patient acceptance to ensure the system is fit for purpose for pharmacy practice.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%