2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11101207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explorative Study on Mapping Surface Facies of Selected Glaciers from Chandra Basin, Himalaya Using WorldView-2 Data

Abstract: Mapping of surface glacier facies has been a part of several glaciological applications. The study of glacier facies in the Himalayas has gained momentum in the last decade owing to the implications imposed by these facies on the melt characteristics of the glaciers. Some of the most commonly reported surface facies in the Himalayas are snow, ice, ice mixed debris, and debris. The precision of the techniques used to extract glacier facies is of high importance, as the result of many cryospheric studies and eco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is common in glacier mapping studies to evaluate the classification accuracy by comparing the derived glacier boundary with the manually digitised outlines or global inventory of glacier outlines [18,21,57]. Therefore, the glacier boundaries obtained from the classification of different datasets and glaciers (denoted by yellow colour) were compared in this section against the reference datasets of the manually digitised (MD) glacier boundary (denoted by maroon colour) and the manually corrected vector boundary of RGI version 6.0 (denoted by blue colour) as shown in Figures 10-12.…”
Section: Appreciation Of Glacier Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is common in glacier mapping studies to evaluate the classification accuracy by comparing the derived glacier boundary with the manually digitised outlines or global inventory of glacier outlines [18,21,57]. Therefore, the glacier boundaries obtained from the classification of different datasets and glaciers (denoted by yellow colour) were compared in this section against the reference datasets of the manually digitised (MD) glacier boundary (denoted by maroon colour) and the manually corrected vector boundary of RGI version 6.0 (denoted by blue colour) as shown in Figures 10-12.…”
Section: Appreciation Of Glacier Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, OBIA has the potential to discriminate classes using spatial attributes. Additionally, the mountain shadows and some valley rock areas needed manual corrections, making it a tedious task [21]. We could automatically mask shadowed regions from the WorldView-2 + ancillary dataset using the shadow detection index and brightness temperature rulesets for both the glaciers and from the LISS-4 + ancillary dataset using the brightness attribute with accuracies lying in between 96.0 and 100%.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Debris-covered Glacier Mapping Obia Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of ROI was done on the basis of visual interpretation, spectral reflectance, user knowledge and experience. The ROI for Edithbreen was created and the spectral reflectance was compared to previous studies (Jawak et al 2019) and spectral libraries were used to assign class to each ROI. The supervised classification of the glacier was performed using the TERCAT tool of the ENVI 5.3 into 10 classes which are crevasses, debris, dry snow, melting ice, offglacier, percolation snow, shadow, water stream, wet snow, dirty ice.…”
Section: Ground Resolution (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supervised classification of the glacier was performed using the TERCAT tool of the ENVI 5.3 into 10 classes which are crevasses, debris, dry snow, melting ice, offglacier, percolation snow, shadow, water stream, wet snow, dirty ice. We used advanced supervised classifiers: MXL, MHD, and MD, as these have been reported to deliver higher accuracies in the previous studies (Jawak et al 2018(Jawak et al , 2019.…”
Section: Ground Resolution (M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction of surface facies has been demonstrated using methods incorporating data from a single sensor [2][3][4][5] as well as multiple sensors and data products [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Many of the persistent problems of mapping mountain glaciers revolve around solving the spectral complexities of supraglacial debris [6,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%