2017
DOI: 10.1590/1982-02752017000200003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the Roteiro de Avaliação da Consciência Fonológica, a phonological awareness test

Abstract: The objective of this study is to investigate the evidence of construct validity of a phonological awareness instrument. Exploratory factor analysis was carried out on data collected from 510 elementary and middle school students in 2nd and 6th grades attending two different public schools in the city of São Paulo, Brazil; most were males with mean age of 8.4 years. Confirmatory factor analysis was carried out on data collected from 427 students from other four Brazilian states in the same grades; most were fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering other studies that investigated the factorial structure of different phonological awareness measures with Brazilian Portuguese speaking children (Godoy and Cogo-Moreira, 2015;Santos and Lima, 2017;Germano et al, 2017), the most comparable to ours is the study by Germano et al (2017). The study by Godoy and Cogo-Moreira (2015) and the study by Santos and Lima (2017) did not manipulate the linguistic unit involved in the phonological awareness tasks in their study (they only employed phonemic tasks) and investigated older children (from first to 6 th grade). Especially in Santos and Lima's study, the results are difficult to interpret because there is no manipulation of phonological unit (e.g., syllable X phoneme) or cognitive demand (e.g., analysis X synthesis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Considering other studies that investigated the factorial structure of different phonological awareness measures with Brazilian Portuguese speaking children (Godoy and Cogo-Moreira, 2015;Santos and Lima, 2017;Germano et al, 2017), the most comparable to ours is the study by Germano et al (2017). The study by Godoy and Cogo-Moreira (2015) and the study by Santos and Lima (2017) did not manipulate the linguistic unit involved in the phonological awareness tasks in their study (they only employed phonemic tasks) and investigated older children (from first to 6 th grade). Especially in Santos and Lima's study, the results are difficult to interpret because there is no manipulation of phonological unit (e.g., syllable X phoneme) or cognitive demand (e.g., analysis X synthesis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Regarding studies conducted with Brazilian Portuguese speakers, to our knowledge, three studies investigated the factorial structure of different measures of phonological awareness: Godoy and Cogo-Moreira (2015); Santos and Lima (2017); and Germano, César, and Capellini (2017). The study by Godoy and Cogo-Moreira (2015) included three measures of phonemic awareness (phoneme segmentation, onset deletion in nonwords with a consonant-vowel-consonant [CVC] structure, and onset deletion in nonwords with a consonant-consonant-vowel [CCV] structure); this study was conducted with 176 Brazilian 1 st to 5 th graders.…”
Section: Studies With Brazilian Portuguesementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A tarefa tem evidência de validade preditiva demonstrada no estudo de Santos (1996), validade de critério, por ano escolar (Suehiro & Santos, 2011) e nível de leitura (Mota, Santos, Guimarães, & Conti, 2014). Outras propriedades psicométricas, como a validade de construto, também foram testadas com o RACF (Santos & Lima, 2017). Segundo Santos (1996), a análise de consistência interna da tarefa apresenta índices adequados, alfa de Cronbach (α) > 0,70.…”
Section: Instrumentos Consciência Fonológicaunclassified