2020
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis in clinical studies: Which one should you use?

Abstract: following criteria recommended by the ICMJE (http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/)]:• Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the multivariate normality was confirmed, we tested the factorial validity with maximum likelihood estimation. The model of the factor proposed is deemed valid when all items show a factorial load higher than 0.4 [ 44 , 47 , 48 ]. The construct’s validity was calculated through convergent validity (using the average variance extracted (AVE) for each factor and considering 0.50 as the minimum value) and the discriminant validity, confirmed by evidence that the AVE for each pair of factors is equal to or greater than the square of the correlation between them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the multivariate normality was confirmed, we tested the factorial validity with maximum likelihood estimation. The model of the factor proposed is deemed valid when all items show a factorial load higher than 0.4 [ 44 , 47 , 48 ]. The construct’s validity was calculated through convergent validity (using the average variance extracted (AVE) for each factor and considering 0.50 as the minimum value) and the discriminant validity, confirmed by evidence that the AVE for each pair of factors is equal to or greater than the square of the correlation between them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors stated that “an EFA using principal components analysis was undertaken to explore the underlying structure of the NSEQ” ([ 1 ], P. 5). However, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and principal component analysis (PCA) are two different methods for different purposes [ 2 , 3 ]. Although in some studies EFA and PCA incorrectly have been used interchangeably (See [ 3 ]), as Fokkema and Greiff [ 4 ] stated “PCA should never be referred to as (exploratory) factor analysis” (p. 401).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EFA was conducted via principal component analysis and the direct oblimin rotation method to determine the scale's factor structure. Principal component analysis, one of the best estimation methods of EFA, was chosen because of capturing maximum variance and determining key factors by simplifying complex data (Alavi et al, 2020). Items with cross-loading (loaded >0.30 in two or more dimensions and the difference between factor loadings <0.1) (Kline, 2015) and/or factor loadings <0.50 were eliminated to obtain a more robust factor structure.…”
Section: Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%