2010
DOI: 10.3758/app.72.3.823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploratory pressure influences haptic shape perception via force signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drewing and colleagues (Drewing & Ernst, 2006;Drewing & Kaim, 2009;Kaim & Drewing, 2010) proposed that a maximum likelihood estimation combination of cues explains haptic perception of shape properties. Conceivably, some similar combination of influences affected IFD judgments under the conditions tested in the present experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Drewing and colleagues (Drewing & Ernst, 2006;Drewing & Kaim, 2009;Kaim & Drewing, 2010) proposed that a maximum likelihood estimation combination of cues explains haptic perception of shape properties. Conceivably, some similar combination of influences affected IFD judgments under the conditions tested in the present experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drewing and colleagues (Drewing & Ernst, 2006;Drewing & Kaim, 2009;Drewing et al, 2008;Kaim & Drewing, 2010) pointed out that some haptic spatial perceptual effects (i.e., surface curvature judgments) apparently depend on an amalgam of information from changing finger position and force change, both available as the finger moves across a curved surface. Robles-de-la-Torre and Hayward (2001) demonstrated that when force and geometry (essentially, finger position) conflict, force relationships take priority in categorizing curved versus flat surfaces.…”
Section: Force-based Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Already mentioned was Drewing and Ernst's (2006) research, which demonstrated that the vertical force that a perceiver exerts in exploratory rubbing of a surface differentially weights cues in haptic shape perception. Kaim and Drewing (2010) went on to demonstrate that an exploration-based integration model accounted for results that could not be accounted for by cognitive integration of individual cues using a maximum likelihood estimation model (e.g., Ernst & Banks, 2002). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, we deny that cues are combined. Drewing and colleagues (Drewing & Ernst, 2006;Kaim & Drewing, 2010) have made an analogous argument for haptic exploration, asserting that the modulation of exploratory force functionally weights the cues of position and force in haptic shape perception.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%