2022
DOI: 10.1111/pan.14598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring a case of incompatibility in a complex regimen containing Plasma‐Lyte 148 in the pediatric intensive care

Abstract: Background: In the local pediatric intensive care unit, precipitation was observed in the intravenous catheter upon co-administration of four drugs together with the buffered electrolyte solution (Plasma-Lyte 148, Baxter). Co-infusion of incompatible combinations represents a safety concern. Aims:To reproduce the clinical case of precipitation. To further explore and understand the risk of precipitation, different combinations of the components as well as the corresponding electrolyte solution with 5% glucose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Developing validated methods for multiple component solutions demands time and resources, and relying on visual control for detection of precipitates does not cover sub-visible particles neither does it provide the solid form identity of the precipitate. The current methods for assessment of physical y-site compatibility include pH and turbidity measurements, sub-visual particle counting, osmolality, and if one of the components are or contain a parenteral lipid emulsion also mean droplet diameter measurement, and estimation of percentage of large diameter droplets (>5 μm, PFAT5). However, in neither of these methods, the identity of the precipitate can be determined beyond theoretical predictions based on solubility and pH. Raman spectroscopy could potentially redeem some of the challenges met with classical compatibility testing, ,, extending the limits of what can be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing validated methods for multiple component solutions demands time and resources, and relying on visual control for detection of precipitates does not cover sub-visible particles neither does it provide the solid form identity of the precipitate. The current methods for assessment of physical y-site compatibility include pH and turbidity measurements, sub-visual particle counting, osmolality, and if one of the components are or contain a parenteral lipid emulsion also mean droplet diameter measurement, and estimation of percentage of large diameter droplets (>5 μm, PFAT5). However, in neither of these methods, the identity of the precipitate can be determined beyond theoretical predictions based on solubility and pH. Raman spectroscopy could potentially redeem some of the challenges met with classical compatibility testing, ,, extending the limits of what can be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%