2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.97.125124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring a potential energy surface by machine learning for characterizing atomic transport

Abstract: We propose a machine-learning method for evaluating the potential barrier governing atomic transport based on the preferential selection of dominant points for the atomic transport. The proposed method generates numerous random samples of the entire potential energy surface (PES) from a probabilistic Gaussian process model of the PES, which enables defining the likelihood of the dominant points. The robustness and efficiency of the method are demonstrated on a dozen model cases for proton diffusion in oxides, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T he recent rise in the popularity of machine-learning (ML) methods has engendered many advances in the molecular sciences. These include the prediction of properties of atomistic systems across chemical space , the construction of accurate force fields [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] for ML-based molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, the representation of the (high-dimensional) statistical distribution of molecular conformers [40][41][42] , or the prediction of the kinetics of structural transformation of materials 43 . In many applications, a key task for an ML model is to predict the outcome of an electronic structure calculation without the calculation's having to be explicitly performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T he recent rise in the popularity of machine-learning (ML) methods has engendered many advances in the molecular sciences. These include the prediction of properties of atomistic systems across chemical space , the construction of accurate force fields [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] for ML-based molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, the representation of the (high-dimensional) statistical distribution of molecular conformers [40][41][42] , or the prediction of the kinetics of structural transformation of materials 43 . In many applications, a key task for an ML model is to predict the outcome of an electronic structure calculation without the calculation's having to be explicitly performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibilities of applying ML for optimization in Chemistry are endless. There are studies focused on ML approaches for inferring on the optimized geometry of a system (Zielinski et al, 2017;Venkatasubramanian, 2019), and finding minima on complex potential energy surfaces (Chen et al, 2015;Chmiela et al, 2018;Kanamori et al, 2018;Xia and Kais, 2018;Hughes et al, 2019), such as those of large water clusters (Bose et al, 2018;Chan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Machine Learning For Optimization: Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling procedures give impressive reduction in computational cost [58,[61][62][63][64][65][66], but there is a weakness with such a metric: it depends on the grid density set by the user. By applying a finer grid, the computational cost of the brute force method -which is simply calculating all the grid points -will increase.…”
Section: Issues With Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%