2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring adolescent engagement in sexual and reproductive health research in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda: A scoping review

Abstract: Adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) in East Africa has prioritized research on the barriers to care, communication, and ASRH knowledge, attitudes, and practices. However, there is little research examining the extent to which meaningful adolescent engagement in research is achieved in practice and how this influences the evidence available to inform ASRH services. This review offers a critical step towards understanding current approaches to adolescent engagement in ASRH research and identifying o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrates the need to make existing SRH services more adolescent-responsive in humanitarian settings. Adolescents–married and unmarried—should be engaged in an age-appropriate, meaningful way so that their experiences and voices are included in the planning and designing of SRH services [ 41 ]. Although SRH programs and research typically prioritize girls, it is also important to address boy’s experiences, needs, and barriers to accessing SRH services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study demonstrates the need to make existing SRH services more adolescent-responsive in humanitarian settings. Adolescents–married and unmarried—should be engaged in an age-appropriate, meaningful way so that their experiences and voices are included in the planning and designing of SRH services [ 41 ]. Although SRH programs and research typically prioritize girls, it is also important to address boy’s experiences, needs, and barriers to accessing SRH services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals who participated in IDIs were not eligible to participate in CIs. We oversampled adolescents 18 and younger to optimize the representation of their perspectives in light of this group’s considerable underrepresentation in SRH research due to the inherent challenges of engaging minors in research [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%