2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Alternative Strategies for the Identification of Potent Compounds Using Support Vector Machine and Regression Modeling

Abstract: Support vector regression (SVR) is a premier approach for the prediction of compound potency. Given the conceptual link between support vector machine (SVM) and SVR modeling, SVR is capable of accounting for continuous and discontinuous structure−activity relationships (SARs) in potency prediction, which further extends the classical quantitative SAR (QSAR) paradigm. In the context of virtual compound screening, compound potency prediction can be applied to identify the most potent compounds that are available… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SVMs have demonstrated value as QSAR models. , The training and comparison of several baseline machine learning models including logistic regression, decision trees, and Gaussian Bayes demonstrated significantly superior performance of the SVM for both classes in accuracy, precision, recall, and f1 score (Figures S3 and S4A). We therefore proceeded with parameter tuning of the SVM to achieve a final agonist classification model for the α 2A -AR molecular library.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVMs have demonstrated value as QSAR models. , The training and comparison of several baseline machine learning models including logistic regression, decision trees, and Gaussian Bayes demonstrated significantly superior performance of the SVM for both classes in accuracy, precision, recall, and f1 score (Figures S3 and S4A). We therefore proceeded with parameter tuning of the SVM to achieve a final agonist classification model for the α 2A -AR molecular library.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five sets of active compounds with highly confident potency data and ZINC decoy compounds were taken from a previous study on virtual screening. 25 The target activity sets, originally used for activity cliff analysis, 26 were extracted from the ChEMBL database (version 23) 27 and showed large potency variation. Compound potency was specified in the form of equilibrium constants (K i ).…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…95 Although developed fairly recently, support vector machines (SVM) have demonstrated significant value as activity prediction models. [96][97] The SVM model for PCP site activity prediction achieved a ten-fold cross-validated accuracy of 0.95, with a weighted average precision of 0.98, recall of 0.97, and f1 of 0.97 on the test set (Figure S2). We built the initial classification models using a training set comprised of samples from only the library actives and inactives, which resulted in worse than desired performance due to the scarcity of inactives (N=X).…”
Section: Ligand-based Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%